Does internal migration improve overall well-being in Ethiopia?

Alan de Brauw, Valerie Mueller, Tassew Woldehanna

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Scopus citations


Standard economic models suggest that individuals participate in migration to improve their well-being, whether those decisions are made at the individual or the household level. However, explicit and implicit barriers to movement both within and between countries can hinder migration, potentially affecting welfare improvement. In this article, we use a unique panel dataset of tracked migrants and non-migrants that originate from 18 peasant associations in Ethiopia to examine the welfare impacts of internal migration. Using several techniques, we measure the association of migration with improved welfare among migrants relative non-migrants. We find that migrant welfare improves in a number of different ways; their non-food consumption rises by at least 145%, and we find that migrants also have improved diets relative to non-migrants. Gains are larger among male and urban migrants, as well as migrants who left a longer time in the past. The large welfare contribution of migration, conditional on migrating for employment, suggest that barriers exist, even within countries such as Ethiopia, against the free movement of people to places where they would be objectively better off.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)347-365
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of African Economies
Issue number3
StatePublished - Jun 1 2018

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Development
  • Economics and Econometrics


Dive into the research topics of 'Does internal migration improve overall well-being in Ethiopia?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this