TY - JOUR
T1 - Distribution shapes govern the discovery of predictive models for gene regulation
AU - Munsky, Brian
AU - Li, Guoliang
AU - Fox, Zachary R.
AU - Shepherd, Douglas P.
AU - Neuert, Gregor
N1 - Funding Information:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. We thank Luis Aguilera, Anthony Weil, Bill Tansey, Roger Colbran, Alexander Thiemicke, Dustin Rogers, Benjamin Kesler, Rohit Venkat, and Amanda Johnson for comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by W. M. Keck Foundation Grant DTRA FRCALL 12-3-2-0002 and NIH Grant R35GM124747 (to B.E.M. and Z.R.F.) and by NIH Grants DP2 GM11484901 and R01GM115892 and Vanderbilt Startup Funds (to G.L. and G.N.).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 National Academy of Sciences. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2018/7/17
Y1 - 2018/7/17
N2 - Despite substantial experimental and computational efforts, mechanistic modeling remains more predictive in engineering than in systems biology. The reason for this discrepancy is not fully understood. One might argue that the randomness and complexity of biological systems are the main barriers to predictive understanding, but these issues are not unique to biology. Instead, we hypothesize that the specific shapes of rare single-molecule event distributions produce substantial yet overlooked challenges for biological models. We demonstrate why modern statistical tools to disentangle complexity and stochasticity, which assume normally distributed fluctuations or enormous datasets, do not apply to the discrete, positive, and nonsymmetric distributions that characterize mRNA fluctuations in single cells. As an example, we integrate single-molecule measurements and advanced computational analyses to explore mitogen-activated protein kinase induction of multiple stress response genes. Through systematic analyses of different metrics to compare the same model to the same data, we elucidate why standard modeling approaches yield nonpredictive models for single-cell gene regulation. We further explain how advanced tools recover precise, reproducible, and predictive understanding of transcription regulation mechanisms, including gene activation, polymerase initiation, elongation, mRNA accumulation, spatial transport, and decay.
AB - Despite substantial experimental and computational efforts, mechanistic modeling remains more predictive in engineering than in systems biology. The reason for this discrepancy is not fully understood. One might argue that the randomness and complexity of biological systems are the main barriers to predictive understanding, but these issues are not unique to biology. Instead, we hypothesize that the specific shapes of rare single-molecule event distributions produce substantial yet overlooked challenges for biological models. We demonstrate why modern statistical tools to disentangle complexity and stochasticity, which assume normally distributed fluctuations or enormous datasets, do not apply to the discrete, positive, and nonsymmetric distributions that characterize mRNA fluctuations in single cells. As an example, we integrate single-molecule measurements and advanced computational analyses to explore mitogen-activated protein kinase induction of multiple stress response genes. Through systematic analyses of different metrics to compare the same model to the same data, we elucidate why standard modeling approaches yield nonpredictive models for single-cell gene regulation. We further explain how advanced tools recover precise, reproducible, and predictive understanding of transcription regulation mechanisms, including gene activation, polymerase initiation, elongation, mRNA accumulation, spatial transport, and decay.
KW - Modelin
KW - Prediction
KW - Quantitative
KW - Single cell
KW - Transcription
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049940537&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049940537&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1073/pnas.1804060115
DO - 10.1073/pnas.1804060115
M3 - Article
C2 - 29959206
AN - SCOPUS:85049940537
SN - 0027-8424
VL - 115
SP - 7533
EP - 7538
JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
IS - 29
ER -