Differences in the morphology, physiology and gene expression of honey bee queens and workers reared in vitro versus in situ

Daiana A. De Souza, Osman Kaftanoglu, David De Jong, Robert Page, Gro Amdam, Ying Wang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

The effect of larval nutrition on female fertility in honey bees is a focus for both scientific studies and for practical applications in beekeeping. In general, morphological traits are standards for classifying queens and workers and for evaluating their quality. In recent years, in vitro rearing techniques have been improved and used in many studies; they can produce queen-like and worker-like bees. Here, we questioned whether queens and workers reared in vitro are the same as queens and workers reared in a natural hive environment. We reared workers and queens both in vitro and naturally in beehives to test how these different environments affect metabolic physiology and candidate genes in newly emerged queens and workers. We found that sugar (glucose and trehalose) levels differed between queens and workers in both in vitro and in-hive-reared bees. The in vitro-reared bees had significantly higher levels of lipids in the abdomen. Moreover, hive reared queens had almost 20 times higher levels of vitellogenin than in vitro-reared queens, despite similar morphologies. In addition, hive-reared bees had significantly higher levels of expression of mrjp1. In conclusion, in vitro rearing produces queens and workers that differ from those reared in the hive environment at physiological and gene expression levels.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numberbio036616
JournalBiology Open
Volume7
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 2018

Keywords

  • Carbohydrate metabolism
  • Caste development
  • Geometric morphometrics
  • Honey bee queen quality
  • Ovariole number

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Differences in the morphology, physiology and gene expression of honey bee queens and workers reared in vitro versus in situ'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this