Abstract
The authors regret an error in data reduction that resulted in inaccurately reported Gd concentrations in many of our samples. In spite of our usual peak-stripping routine assuming 158Gd was interfered by 142NdO and 142CeO, we instead measured 156Gd (interfered by 140CeO) in several sessions which requires a different peak stripping routine to derive accurate Gd concentrations. In addition to affecting Gd, this also caused small inaccuracies in Yb concentrations (172Yb is interfered by 156GdO). We present here corrected concentrations of Gd and Yb. Quantities calculated using Gd include Eu/Eu* and Yb/Gd, for which we also provide corrected values. We include in this corrigendum an updated Electronic Annex EA-2 (zircon trace element concentrations) and updated versions of Figs. 9 and 10. These errors do not affect the conclusions of the original paper. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Article number | 120306 |
Journal | Chemical Geology |
Volume | 578 |
DOIs |
|
State | Published - Sep 20 2021 |
Externally published | Yes |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Geology
- Geochemistry and Petrology