Corporate managers' reliance on internal auditor recommendations

F. Greg Burton, Scott A. Emett, Chad A. Simon, David A. Wood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

33 Scopus citations


We investigate whether corporate managers' reliance on internal auditors' recommendations in an operational setting is influenced by three recommendation attributes: (1) whether the recommendation was consistent with or inconsistent with management preferences, (2) whether the recommendation was given by an outsourced or in-house internal auditor, and (3) whether the recommendation was quantitative or qualitative in nature. We use a 2×2×2 fractional factorial design to test our predictions. We find that managers change their initial position more when presented with preference-inconsistent recommendations than when presented with preference-consistent recommendations. We do not find differences in managers' reliance on the preference-inconsistent, non-quantified recommendations of outsourced versus in-house internal auditors. However, we find that managers are more likely to rely on the preference-inconsistent recommendations of in-house internal auditors when their recommendations are quantified as opposed to non-quantified, an effect that is not observed with outsourced internal auditors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)151-166
Number of pages16
Issue number2
StatePublished - May 2012
Externally publishedYes


  • Competence
  • In-house
  • Internal audit
  • Objectivity
  • Outsourcing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Accounting
  • Finance
  • Economics and Econometrics


Dive into the research topics of 'Corporate managers' reliance on internal auditor recommendations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this