TY - JOUR
T1 - Congruence between gender stereotypes and activity preference in self-identified tomboys and non-Tomboys
AU - Martin, Carol
AU - Dinella, Lisa M.
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgments This research was supported by funding from ASU Women’s Studies program. We would also like to thank Stacie Leonard and Heidi Wyman for their efforts on this project. We owe special thanks to the directors of the Tempe After-School Program and the girls who participated in this project. Support for this project was provided by the T. Denny Sanford Foundation. Portions of this research were presented at the meetings of the Society for Research in Child Development (2003, Tampa; 2011, Montreal). The authors equally contributed to this research.
PY - 2012/6
Y1 - 2012/6
N2 - The major goal was to examine a central tenet of cognitive approaches to gender development, namely, that congruence exists between personal gender stereotypes and behaviors. Item-by-item comparisons of girls' stereotypes about activities and their preferences for activitieswere conducted, for both girls who claimed to be tomboys and those who did not. Congruence was expected for all girls, but because of their gender non-normative interests, tomboys may exhibit less congruence. Asecondary goal was to examine factors that might influence congruence, specifically,whether tomboys developmore inclusive stereotypes and develop greater understanding of stereotype variability. Participants included 112 girls (7-12 years old, M age=9). Girls were interviewed about their activity preferences, beliefs about girls' and boys' activity preferences, understanding variability of stereotypes, and identification as tomboys. Tomboys (30% of the sample) and non-Tomboys did not differ in their liking of or in the number of liked feminine activities. However, tomboys showed more interest in masculine activities than non-Tomboys. Tomboys and non-Tomboys did not differ in stereotype inclusiveness, although tomboys showed a trend toward more inclusive stereotypes. Both groups showed high levels of congruence between stereotypes and preferences. Congruence was stronger for nontomboys (14 times more likely to exhibit responses congruent with stereotypes vs. incongruent ones), as compared to tomboyswhowere four times more likely to exhibit responses congruent with stereotypes versus incongruent ones. Implications of these findings for cognitive approaches to gender development are discussed.
AB - The major goal was to examine a central tenet of cognitive approaches to gender development, namely, that congruence exists between personal gender stereotypes and behaviors. Item-by-item comparisons of girls' stereotypes about activities and their preferences for activitieswere conducted, for both girls who claimed to be tomboys and those who did not. Congruence was expected for all girls, but because of their gender non-normative interests, tomboys may exhibit less congruence. Asecondary goal was to examine factors that might influence congruence, specifically,whether tomboys developmore inclusive stereotypes and develop greater understanding of stereotype variability. Participants included 112 girls (7-12 years old, M age=9). Girls were interviewed about their activity preferences, beliefs about girls' and boys' activity preferences, understanding variability of stereotypes, and identification as tomboys. Tomboys (30% of the sample) and non-Tomboys did not differ in their liking of or in the number of liked feminine activities. However, tomboys showed more interest in masculine activities than non-Tomboys. Tomboys and non-Tomboys did not differ in stereotype inclusiveness, although tomboys showed a trend toward more inclusive stereotypes. Both groups showed high levels of congruence between stereotypes and preferences. Congruence was stronger for nontomboys (14 times more likely to exhibit responses congruent with stereotypes vs. incongruent ones), as compared to tomboyswhowere four times more likely to exhibit responses congruent with stereotypes versus incongruent ones. Implications of these findings for cognitive approaches to gender development are discussed.
KW - Gender role behavior
KW - Gender schema theory
KW - Gender stereotypes
KW - Tomboys
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864046043&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84864046043&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10508-011-9786-5
DO - 10.1007/s10508-011-9786-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 21755383
AN - SCOPUS:84864046043
SN - 0004-0002
VL - 41
SP - 599
EP - 610
JO - Archives of Sexual Behavior
JF - Archives of Sexual Behavior
IS - 3
ER -