TY - JOUR
T1 - Cochlear implantation for single-sided deafness in children and adolescents
AU - Zeitler, Daniel M.
AU - Sladen, Douglas P.
AU - DeJong, Melissa D.
AU - Torres, Jennifer H.
AU - Dorman, Michael
AU - Carlson, Matthew L.
N1 - Funding Information:
Data presented at the American Cochlear Implant Alliance CI 2017 Pediatric 15th Symposium on Cochlear Implants in Children, July 26–29, 2017. Michael F. Dorman is supported by a grant for research from MED-EL Corporation GmbH.
Funding Information:
DMZ consultant for Advanced Bionics Corp., and MED-EL GmbH, research support from Advanced Bionics Corp.; MLC consultant for and education grants from Advanced Bionics Corp. , Cochlear Corp. , Grace Medical , and MED-EL GmbH ; JHT consultant for Advanced Bionics Corp, MED-EL GmbH.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2019/3
Y1 - 2019/3
N2 - Objective: To evaluate outcomes in pediatric and adolescent patients with single-sided deafness (SSD) undergoing cochlear implantation. Methods: A retrospective cohort design at two tertiary level academic cochlear implant centers. The subjects included nine children ages 1.5 to 15 years-old with single-sided deafness (SSD) who had undergone cochlear implantation in the affected ear. Objective outcome measures included were speech reception testing in quiet and noise, bimodal speech reception threshold testing in noise, tinnitus suppression, and device usage. Results: Nine pediatric and adolescent patients with SSD were implanted between 2011 and 2017. The median age at implantation was 8.9 years (range, 1.5–15.1) and the children had a median duration of deafness 2.9 years (range, 0.8–9.5). There was variability in testing measures due to patient age. Median pre-operative aided word recognition scores on the affected side were <30% regardless of the testing paradigm used. Six patients had pre-operative word testing (4 CNC, median score 25%; 2 MLNT, 8% and 17%). Four patients had pre-operative sentence testing (3 AzBio, median score 44%; 1 HINT-C, 57%). Median post-implantation follow-up interval was 12.3 months (range, 3–27.6 months). Six subjects had post-operative word recognition testing (CNC median, 70%; MLNT 50%, 92%) with a median improvement of 45.5% points. Five subjects had post-operative sentence testing (AzBio, median 82%; HINT, median 76%), with a median improvement of 40.5% points. Eight patients are full time users of their device. Tinnitus and bimodal speech reception thresholds in noise were improved. Conclusion: Pediatric subjects with SSD benefit substantially from cochlear implantation. Objective speech outcome measures are improved in both quiet and noise, and bimodal speech reception thresholds in noise are greatly improved. There is a low rate of device non-use.
AB - Objective: To evaluate outcomes in pediatric and adolescent patients with single-sided deafness (SSD) undergoing cochlear implantation. Methods: A retrospective cohort design at two tertiary level academic cochlear implant centers. The subjects included nine children ages 1.5 to 15 years-old with single-sided deafness (SSD) who had undergone cochlear implantation in the affected ear. Objective outcome measures included were speech reception testing in quiet and noise, bimodal speech reception threshold testing in noise, tinnitus suppression, and device usage. Results: Nine pediatric and adolescent patients with SSD were implanted between 2011 and 2017. The median age at implantation was 8.9 years (range, 1.5–15.1) and the children had a median duration of deafness 2.9 years (range, 0.8–9.5). There was variability in testing measures due to patient age. Median pre-operative aided word recognition scores on the affected side were <30% regardless of the testing paradigm used. Six patients had pre-operative word testing (4 CNC, median score 25%; 2 MLNT, 8% and 17%). Four patients had pre-operative sentence testing (3 AzBio, median score 44%; 1 HINT-C, 57%). Median post-implantation follow-up interval was 12.3 months (range, 3–27.6 months). Six subjects had post-operative word recognition testing (CNC median, 70%; MLNT 50%, 92%) with a median improvement of 45.5% points. Five subjects had post-operative sentence testing (AzBio, median 82%; HINT, median 76%), with a median improvement of 40.5% points. Eight patients are full time users of their device. Tinnitus and bimodal speech reception thresholds in noise were improved. Conclusion: Pediatric subjects with SSD benefit substantially from cochlear implantation. Objective speech outcome measures are improved in both quiet and noise, and bimodal speech reception thresholds in noise are greatly improved. There is a low rate of device non-use.
KW - Adolescent
KW - Cochlear implantation
KW - Pediatric
KW - Sensorineural hearing loss
KW - Single-sided deafness
KW - Tinnitus
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059536829&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059536829&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.12.037
DO - 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.12.037
M3 - Article
C2 - 30623849
AN - SCOPUS:85059536829
SN - 0165-5876
VL - 118
SP - 128
EP - 133
JO - International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
JF - International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
ER -