Classifying the effectiveness of veterans affairs guideline implementation approaches

Bonnie J. BootsMiller, Jon W. Yankey, Stephen D. Flach, Marcia M. Ward, Thomas E. Vaughn, Karl F. Welke, Bradley N. Doebbeling

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations


Hospitals use numerous guideline implementation approaches with varying success. Approaches have been classified as consistently, variably, or minimally effective, with multiple approaches being most effective. This project assesses the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) use of effective guideline implementation approaches. A survey of 123 VA quality managers assessed the approaches used to implement the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, and major depressive disorder guidelines. Approaches were categorized based on their effectiveness, and the total number of approaches used was calculated. Commonly used approaches were clinical meetings, summaries, and revised forms. Consistently and minimally effective approaches were used most frequently. Most hospitals used 4-7 approaches. Odds ratios demonstrated that consistently effective approaches were paired with minimally and variably effective approaches. The frequent use of consistently effective approaches and multiple approaches benefits VA adherence. However, VA hospitals should consider selective combinations of approaches to ensure the use of the most effective implementation methods.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)248-254
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Medical Quality
Issue number6
StatePublished - 2004
Externally publishedYes


  • Guideline implementation
  • Practice guidelines
  • Quality
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine


Dive into the research topics of 'Classifying the effectiveness of veterans affairs guideline implementation approaches'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this