Can Situational and Structural Factors Differentiate Between Intimate Partner and "Other" Homicide?

Christina DeJong, Jesenia M. Pizarro, Edmund F. McGarrell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

36 Scopus citations


A large body of research has identified strong and consistent correlates of aggregated intimate homicide incidents; however, the bulk of these studies focuses on the influence of either case or neighborhood characteristics on homicide types, but not both. This study examines data collected from 739 homicides in two distinct metropolitan cities to determine which factors differentiate intimate and non-intimate homicide. Findings reveal that intimate partner homicides (IPH) are more likely to involve females both as victims and offenders when compared to non-IPH incidents. In addition, IPH homicides are more likely to be committed with weapons than non-IPH, but this finding only appears in Indianapolis homicides. Indeed, one of the stark contrasts between Indianapolis and Newark was the much greater prevalence of firearms involved in IPH homicides in Indianapolis. This suggests the need for future research that sorts out patterns of household gun possession, factors influencing community levels of household gun possession, and the use of legally- or illegally-possessed firearms in IPH homicide.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)365-376
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Family Violence
Issue number5
StatePublished - Jul 2011
Externally publishedYes


  • Domestic violence
  • Economic deprivation
  • Female inequality
  • Homicide
  • Intimate partner homicide
  • Social disorganization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Law


Dive into the research topics of 'Can Situational and Structural Factors Differentiate Between Intimate Partner and "Other" Homicide?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this