TY - JOUR
T1 - Bycatch
T2 - interactional expertise, dolphins and the US tuna fishery
AU - Jenkins, Lekelia D.
N1 - Funding Information:
I would like to acknowledge my Ph.D. advisors Larry Crowder and Michael Orbach for their advice and support over the course of my dissertation research at Duke University. I am thankful to Michael Gorman and Sara Maxwell their insightful input. I greatly appreciate Harry Collins for his extensive editing and advice. I would also like to thank the National Science Foundation and the Oak Foundation for funding this research.
PY - 2007/12
Y1 - 2007/12
N2 - The burgeoning field of studies in expertise and experience (SEE) is a useful theoretical approach to complex problems. In light of SEE, examination of the controversial and well known case study of dolphin bycatch in the US tuna fishery, reveals that effective problem-solving was hindered by institutional tensions in respect of decision-making authority and difficulties with the integration of different expertises. Comparing the profiles of four individuals, who played distinct roles in the problem-solving process, I show that (1) to address a complex problem, a suite of contributory expertises-rarely found in one individual-may be required; (2) formal credentials are not a reliable indicator of who possesses these necessary expertises; (3) interactional expertise and interactive ability are useful tools in combining the contributory expertises of others to yield a desirable collective outcome; and (4) the concepts of contributory expertise and no expertise are useful tools for understanding the actual contribution of various parties to the problem-solving process.
AB - The burgeoning field of studies in expertise and experience (SEE) is a useful theoretical approach to complex problems. In light of SEE, examination of the controversial and well known case study of dolphin bycatch in the US tuna fishery, reveals that effective problem-solving was hindered by institutional tensions in respect of decision-making authority and difficulties with the integration of different expertises. Comparing the profiles of four individuals, who played distinct roles in the problem-solving process, I show that (1) to address a complex problem, a suite of contributory expertises-rarely found in one individual-may be required; (2) formal credentials are not a reliable indicator of who possesses these necessary expertises; (3) interactional expertise and interactive ability are useful tools in combining the contributory expertises of others to yield a desirable collective outcome; and (4) the concepts of contributory expertise and no expertise are useful tools for understanding the actual contribution of various parties to the problem-solving process.
KW - Bycatch
KW - Conservation technology
KW - Expertise and experience
KW - Interactional expertise
KW - Invention
KW - Tuna-dolphin
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=36549070108&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=36549070108&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.shpsa.2007.09.005
DO - 10.1016/j.shpsa.2007.09.005
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:36549070108
SN - 0039-3681
VL - 38
SP - 698
EP - 712
JO - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A
JF - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A
IS - 4
ER -