TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessing the ecosystem services and disservices provided by migratory wildlife across the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem
AU - Maher, Samantha M.L.
AU - Barker, Kristin J.
AU - Kroetz, Kailin
AU - Butsic, Van
AU - Leonard, Bryan
AU - Middleton, Arthur D.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was funded by the Knobloch Family Foundation, the Property and Environment Resource Center (PERC) Graduate Fellow and Visiting Fellows Programs, and the Oliver B. Lyman Wildlife and Fisheries Fund. Kroetz, Leonard, and Middleton received support for this work through Natural Resource Economics (ENRE) Program through AWD00035948 from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture.The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Samantha ML Maher, Kailin Kroetz, and Bryan Leonard report financial support was provided by The Property and Environment Research Center. Samantha ML Maher reports financial support was provided by Knobloch Family Foundation. Samantha ML Maher reports financial support was provided by Oliver B. Lyman Wildlife and Fisheries Fund.First and foremost, we would like to thank the numerous stakeholders, Tribes, organizations, and agencies for their valuable time participating in interviews or reviewing the project methodology and results. Without their time and support, this project would not have been possible. We also express our gratitude for fellow researchers at Property and Environment Research Center (PERC) and members of the Land Use Change and Middleton Labs at UC Berkeley who spent time giving feedback at various stages of this project. Last, we are grateful for financial support from the Property and Environment Resource Center (PERC) Graduate Fellow and Visiting Fellows Programs, The Knobloch Family Foundation, and the Oliver B. Lyman Wildlife and Fisheries Fund.
Funding Information:
We suggest that a comprehensive understanding of ESDs associated with migratory wildlife supports approaches to conservation policy that seeks to transfer resources from those who receive the greatest benefits to those who experience the greatest costs. Our results highlight some areas of policy that already meet this distributional goal and could possibly be strengthened, and other areas for potential innovation. For instance, the US public receives a variety of benefits from migratory wildlife, and federal conservation programs such as those in the Farm Bill provide a means to transfer their tax dollars to supporting conservation or reducing conflicts on private land. Indeed, the US Department of Agriculture recently announced a pilot program focused on the conservation of migratory ungulates in the western US. 3 3 On the other hand, millions of national park visitors receive substantial benefits from migratory wildlife and the associated food web inside national parks, but no policy instrument currently allows these visitors to assist with wildlife conservation and human-wildlife conflict reduction immediately beyond park boundaries. A recent proposal in Wyoming suggests that park visitors be charged a “wildlife conservation fee” that would harness public enthusiasm for wildlife to finance large-landscape conservation in the GYE ( Middleton et al., 2021 ). Similarly, The Property and Environment Research Center (PERC), a non-profit based in Montana, recently launched a compensation fund to provide financial relief to ranchers whose cattle contract brucellosis from wildlife, a program largely funded by conservation organizations and sportsmen. 4 4 These and other policies which seek to redistribute some of the costs and benefits of coexisting with wildlife hold significant promise in reducing conflicts amongst stakeholders in the GYE and other migratory systems.
Funding Information:
This research was funded by the Knobloch Family Foundation , the Property and Environment Resource Center (PERC) Graduate Fellow and Visiting Fellows Programs , and the Oliver B. Lyman Wildlife and Fisheries Fund . Kroetz, Leonard, and Middleton received support for this work through Natural Resource Economics (ENRE) Program through AWD00035948 from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2023/7
Y1 - 2023/7
N2 - Highly mobile and migratory wildlife are ecologically, culturally, and economically important because they provide ecosystem services across heterogenous landscapes. Migratory ungulates (hoofed mammals) are particularly influential because of their large body size, seasonal movement across vast distances, and ties to human society. Ungulate migrations are widely declining in the face of habitat alteration, and initiatives across the globe seek to conserve them. However, migratory herds can generate significant costs or disservices for landowners and communities, complicating management and conservation. We demonstrate how a comprehensive assessment of the ecosystem services and disservices (ESDs) provided by mobile wildlife can enable conservation policy that facilitates co-existence across multi-use landscapes. Our mixed-methods approach applies the widely recognized Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) ESD categories as a framework to combine formal scientific knowledge spanning multiple disciplines with experiential knowledge gathered from local stakeholders through interviews. We apply this methodology in the context of the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem (GYE), which harbors long-distance migrations of six ungulate species that move between public protected areas and private working lands. We discuss how stakeholder knowledge corroborates or contradicts scientific literature and characterize stakeholder groups and their perspectives. We suggest that formal assessments of ESDs within their ecological and socioeconomic contexts could mobilize resources for conservation, increase returns on conservation spending, and support conflict resolution amongst groups seeking to manage wildlife for different objectives.
AB - Highly mobile and migratory wildlife are ecologically, culturally, and economically important because they provide ecosystem services across heterogenous landscapes. Migratory ungulates (hoofed mammals) are particularly influential because of their large body size, seasonal movement across vast distances, and ties to human society. Ungulate migrations are widely declining in the face of habitat alteration, and initiatives across the globe seek to conserve them. However, migratory herds can generate significant costs or disservices for landowners and communities, complicating management and conservation. We demonstrate how a comprehensive assessment of the ecosystem services and disservices (ESDs) provided by mobile wildlife can enable conservation policy that facilitates co-existence across multi-use landscapes. Our mixed-methods approach applies the widely recognized Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) ESD categories as a framework to combine formal scientific knowledge spanning multiple disciplines with experiential knowledge gathered from local stakeholders through interviews. We apply this methodology in the context of the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem (GYE), which harbors long-distance migrations of six ungulate species that move between public protected areas and private working lands. We discuss how stakeholder knowledge corroborates or contradicts scientific literature and characterize stakeholder groups and their perspectives. We suggest that formal assessments of ESDs within their ecological and socioeconomic contexts could mobilize resources for conservation, increase returns on conservation spending, and support conflict resolution amongst groups seeking to manage wildlife for different objectives.
KW - Disservices
KW - Ecosystem services
KW - Migration
KW - Private lands
KW - Wildlife
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85159806910&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85159806910&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110090
DO - 10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110090
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85159806910
SN - 0006-3207
VL - 283
JO - Biological Conservation
JF - Biological Conservation
M1 - 110090
ER -