Appellate Review of Child Sexual Abuse Convictions: The Importance of Character Evidence

Suzanne St George, Hayden Henderson, Michaela Flippin, Stacia N. Stolzenberg, Thomas D. Lyon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study examined the role of character evidence and other issues in criminal appeals of child sexual abuse (CSA) convictions. Character evidence includes uncharged acts and character witnesses who testify to another’s reputation or opinion and is offered to prove an individual’s propensities. Examining 168 appellate court opinions reviewing CSA convictions between 2005 and 2015 in Maricopa County, Arizona, we found that when specific types of evidence were at issue, they were most often character evidence issues (49%). However, appellate courts virtually never reversed convictions (n = 5), and when defendants did obtain relief, the reduction in charges or in sentences was minor. Of the small number of opinions that were published (n = 4), all focused on character evidence, including the single case reviewed by the Arizona Supreme Court. However, close examination of the published cases suggested they effected only modest change.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalChild Maltreatment
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2023

Keywords

  • child sexual abuse
  • court testimony
  • legal aspects

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Appellate Review of Child Sexual Abuse Convictions: The Importance of Character Evidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this