TY - JOUR
T1 - Antecedents of responsible leader behavior
T2 - A research synthesis, conceptual framework, and agenda for future research
AU - Stahl, Günter K.
AU - De Luque, Mary Sully
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 The Academy of Management Perspectives.
PY - 2014/8/1
Y1 - 2014/8/1
N2 - Responsible leadership has emerged as a major theme in academic and practical management discourse. In this paper we provide an overview and synthesis of existing and emerging research on responsible leadership and propose a unifying framework for explaining leaders' propensity to engage in two types of socially responsible behavior: "do good" and "avoid harm." The framework models the linkages among individual, situational, organizational, institutional, and supranational influences on responsible leader behavior and describes the mechanisms by which these factors may affect a leader's decisions and actions. Our analysis suggests that "do good" and "avoid harm" behaviors are conceptually distinct categories, with different psychological bases and different antecedents that predict them. Further, we find that individuallevel and contextual factors combine and interact to influence responsible leader behavior, and a key aspect of the environment in which leaders act and make decisions- situational strength-moderates the relationship between individual-level factors and a leader's propensity to engage in "do good" and "avoid harm" behavior. In addition to providing directions for future research on responsible leader behavior, this article has several implications for practice, specifically how to select, train, and develop socially responsible leaders.
AB - Responsible leadership has emerged as a major theme in academic and practical management discourse. In this paper we provide an overview and synthesis of existing and emerging research on responsible leadership and propose a unifying framework for explaining leaders' propensity to engage in two types of socially responsible behavior: "do good" and "avoid harm." The framework models the linkages among individual, situational, organizational, institutional, and supranational influences on responsible leader behavior and describes the mechanisms by which these factors may affect a leader's decisions and actions. Our analysis suggests that "do good" and "avoid harm" behaviors are conceptually distinct categories, with different psychological bases and different antecedents that predict them. Further, we find that individuallevel and contextual factors combine and interact to influence responsible leader behavior, and a key aspect of the environment in which leaders act and make decisions- situational strength-moderates the relationship between individual-level factors and a leader's propensity to engage in "do good" and "avoid harm" behavior. In addition to providing directions for future research on responsible leader behavior, this article has several implications for practice, specifically how to select, train, and develop socially responsible leaders.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907434540&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84907434540&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5465/amp.2013.0126
DO - 10.5465/amp.2013.0126
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84907434540
SN - 1558-9080
VL - 28
SP - 235
EP - 254
JO - Academy of Management Perspectives
JF - Academy of Management Perspectives
IS - 3
ER -