Acoustic Ecology 2.0

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations


In this article, I argue for a reassertion of the practice of acoustic ecology. I present an argument for the rejection of the term soundscape in favour of the notion of an acoustic ecology; along the way, I show how the concept of ecology is a powerful tool in re-imaging the role of sound awareness in the society. I argue, however, that acoustic ecology as defined by Luc Ferrari and Murray Schaeffer needs refocusing or revitalizing. I suggest a framework that prioritizes community engagement, exploration, and experience of the sounding world, driven by a desire to build stewardship and agency for change management in the community. The proposed model draws on the sensibilities of acoustic ecology to drive design solutions to anthropocentric sound challenges. This kind of work provides for the development of tools that quantify environmental psychoacoustic metrics and can be used to design and manage acoustic ecologies that contribute to well-being, social cohesion, and quality of life.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)171-181
Number of pages11
JournalContemporary Music Review
Issue number3
StatePublished - May 4 2017


  • Acoustic Ecology
  • Community Engagement
  • Listening
  • Somatic
  • Sound
  • Sustainability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Music


Dive into the research topics of 'Acoustic Ecology 2.0'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this