TY - JOUR
T1 - Accountability for students in K-12 online learning
T2 - Perspectives from michigan stakeholders and beyond
AU - Archambault, Leanna
AU - Kennedy, Kathryn
AU - Freidhoff, Joseph R.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, Sloan Consortium. All rights reserved.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Policy surrounding K-12 online learning continues to evolve as the field grows exponentially. In Michigan, Section 21f of the State School Aid Act enacted in 2013 strengthened parents’ and students’ ability to request online courses: “A student enrolled in a district in any of grades 6 to 12 is eligible to enroll in an online course as provided for in this section.” The passing of 21f raised concerns around accountability in a choice environment. Examples of such concerns included a pervasive belief about the lack of rigor or quality in online courses, an aversion to another district educating a student for one or two courses yet remaining responsible for that student’s growth, and uncertainty about how mentors and teachers would be evaluated on their online students. Consequently, a legislative directive was issued to the Michigan Virtual Learning Research Institute, the research arm of Michigan Virtual University that centered on accountability. In response to that directive, Michigan stakeholders, as well as experts from other course access states and national organizations, were interviewed to better understand the conversations surrounding accountability in K-12 online learning in Michigan and beyond and to make key recommendations for moving the field forward in an informed way. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Implications for research, policy, and practice are shared.
AB - Policy surrounding K-12 online learning continues to evolve as the field grows exponentially. In Michigan, Section 21f of the State School Aid Act enacted in 2013 strengthened parents’ and students’ ability to request online courses: “A student enrolled in a district in any of grades 6 to 12 is eligible to enroll in an online course as provided for in this section.” The passing of 21f raised concerns around accountability in a choice environment. Examples of such concerns included a pervasive belief about the lack of rigor or quality in online courses, an aversion to another district educating a student for one or two courses yet remaining responsible for that student’s growth, and uncertainty about how mentors and teachers would be evaluated on their online students. Consequently, a legislative directive was issued to the Michigan Virtual Learning Research Institute, the research arm of Michigan Virtual University that centered on accountability. In response to that directive, Michigan stakeholders, as well as experts from other course access states and national organizations, were interviewed to better understand the conversations surrounding accountability in K-12 online learning in Michigan and beyond and to make key recommendations for moving the field forward in an informed way. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Implications for research, policy, and practice are shared.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84986238379&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84986238379&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.24059/olj.v20i3.975
DO - 10.24059/olj.v20i3.975
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84986238379
SN - 2472-5749
VL - 20
SP - 126
EP - 139
JO - Online Learning Journal
JF - Online Learning Journal
IS - 3
ER -