A Reasoned Argument Against Banning Psychologists' Involvement in Death Penalty Cases

Stanley L. Brodsky; Tess M.S. Neal; Michelle A. Jones

doi:10.1080/10508422.2013.757954

A Reasoned Argument Against Banning Psychologists' Involvement in Death Penalty Cases

Stanley L. Brodsky, Tess M.S. Neal, Michelle A. Jones

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	62-66
Number of pages	5
Journal	Ethics and Behavior
Volume	23
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2013.757954
State	Published - Jan 2013
Externally published	Yes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Social Psychology
Psychology(all)

Access to Document

10.1080/10508422.2013.757954

Cite this

@article{2c9387bf41ef476fb692612302ebb473,

title = "A Reasoned Argument Against Banning Psychologists' Involvement in Death Penalty Cases",

author = "Brodsky, {Stanley L.} and Neal, {Tess M.S.} and Jones, {Michelle A.}",

year = "2013",

month = jan,

doi = "10.1080/10508422.2013.757954",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "23",

pages = "62--66",

journal = "Ethics and Behavior",

issn = "1050-8422",

publisher = "Routledge",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Reasoned Argument Against Banning Psychologists' Involvement in Death Penalty Cases

AU - Brodsky, Stanley L.

AU - Neal, Tess M.S.

AU - Jones, Michelle A.

PY - 2013/1

Y1 - 2013/1

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873136834&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84873136834&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10508422.2013.757954

DO - 10.1080/10508422.2013.757954

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84873136834

SN - 1050-8422

VL - 23

SP - 62

EP - 66

JO - Ethics and Behavior

JF - Ethics and Behavior

IS - 1

ER -

A Reasoned Argument Against Banning Psychologists' Involvement in Death Penalty Cases

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this