Appendix from Greater wealth inequality, less polygyny: rethinking the polygyny threshold model.

  • Hillard Kaplan (Contributor)
  • Cody T. Ross (Contributor)
  • David Nolin (Contributor)
  • Eckart Voland (Contributor)
  • Samuel Bowles (Contributor)
  • Janet Headland (Contributor)
  • John Bunce (Contributor)
  • Russell D. Greaves (Contributor)
  • Michael Gurven (Contributor)
  • Rob Quinlan (Contributor)
  • Jeremy M. Koster (Contributor)
  • Kai Willfuhr (Contributor)
  • Ryan Schacht (Contributor)
  • Thomas Headland (Contributor)
  • Heidi Colleran (Contributor)
  • Barry S. Hewlett (Contributor)
  • Carmen Cortez (Contributor)
  • Karen Kramer (Contributor)
  • Caissa Revilla-Minaya (Contributor)
  • Ray Uehara (Contributor)
  • Greg Clark (Contributor)
  • Richard McElreath (Contributor)
  • Frank W. Marlowe (Contributor)
  • Kim Hill (Contributor)
  • John Ziker (Contributor)
  • Patricia Draper (Contributor)
  • Marsha Quinlan (Contributor)
  • Mary Shenk (Contributor)
  • Mark Caudell (Contributor)
  • Bret A. Beheim (Contributor)
  • Bruce Winterhalder (Contributor)
  • Brooke A. Scelza (Contributor)
  • Monique Borgerhoff Mulder (Contributor)
  • Seung Yun Oh (Contributor)



Monogamy appears to have become the predominant human mating system with the emergence of highly unequal agricultural populations that replaced relatively egalitarian horticultural populations, challenging the conventional idea—based on the polygyny threshold model—that polygyny should be positively associated with wealth inequality. To address this polygyny paradox, we generalize the standard polygyny threshold model to a mutual mate choice model predicting the fraction of women married polygynously. We then demonstrate two conditions that are jointly sufficient to make monogamy the predominant marriage form, even in highly unequal societies. We assess if these conditions are satisfied using individual-level data from 29 human populations. Our analysis shows that with the shift to stratified agricultural economies: (i) the population frequency of relatively poor individuals increased, increasing wealth inequality, but decreasing the frequency of individuals with sufficient wealth to secure polygynous marriage, and (ii) diminishing marginal fitness returns to additional wives prevent extremely wealthy men from obtaining as many wives as their relative wealth would otherwise predict. These conditions jointly lead to a high population-level frequency of monogamy.
Date made availableJan 1 2018
Publisherfigshare Academic Research System
  • Greater wealth inequality, less polygyny: Rethinking the polygyny threshold model

    Ross, C. T., Mulder, M. B., Oh, S. Y., Bowles, S., Beheim, B., Bunce, J., Caudell, M., Clark, G., Colleran, H., Cortez, C., Draper, P., Greaves, R. D., Gurven, M., Headland, T., Headland, J., Hill, K., Hewlett, B., Kaplan, H. S., Koster, J., Kramer, K., & 14 othersMarlowe, F., McElreath, R., Nolin, D., Quinlan, M., Quinlan, R., Revilla-Minaya, C., Scelza, B., Schacht, R., Shenk, M., Uehara, R., Voland, E., Willfuhr, K., Winterhalder, B. & Ziker, J., Jul 1 2018, In: Journal of the Royal Society Interface. 15, 144, 20180035.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Open Access
    30 Scopus citations

Cite this