Working memory cannot regulate overt emotional capture

Kimberly M. Wingert, Christopher Blais, B. Hunter Ball, Gene Brewer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations


Individual differences in working memory capacity partly arise from variability in attention control, a process influenced by negative emotional content. Thus, individual differences in working memory capacity should predict differences in the ability to regulate attention in emotional contexts. To address this hypothesis, a complex-span working memory task was modified so that negative arousing images or neutral images subtended the background during the encoding phase. Across three experiments, negative arousing images impaired working memory encoding relative to neutral images, resulting in impoverished symmetry span scores. Contrary to the primary hypothesis, individual differences in working memory capacity derived from three complex span tasks failed to moderate the effect of negative arousing images on working memory encoding across two large scale studies. Additionally, in Experiment 3, both negative and arousing images captured attention and were processed despite their incongruence with task goals which led to increased memory for the images in a subsequent recognition task. Implications for theories of working memory and attention control in emotional contexts will be discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)52-64
Number of pages13
JournalActa psychologica
StatePublished - Apr 2018

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)


Dive into the research topics of 'Working memory cannot regulate overt emotional capture'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this