Why We Doubt: A Cognitive Account of Our Skeptical Inclinations

Research output: Book/ReportBook

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

This book, the first of its kind, puts forward a novel and unified cognitive account of philosophical skeptical doubt. Historically, most philosophers have tried to tackle this difficult topic by directly arguing that skeptical doubt is false. But Pinillos does something different. He begins by trying to uncover the hidden mental rule which, for better or worse, motivates our skeptical inclinations. He then gives an account of the broader cognitive purpose of having and applying this rule. Based on these ideas, he shows how we can give a new response to the traditional problem of global skepticism. He also argues that philosophical skepticism is not just something that comes up during philosophical reflection, as David Hume, Charles Sanders Peirce, and other philosophers have urged. Instead, it is of great practical significance. The rule which produces skepticism may itself be operative in certain pathologies such as obsessive-compulsive disorder, in creative endeavors, and in conspiratorial thinking. The rule can also explain some of our reluctance to trust statistical evidence, especially in legal settings. More broadly, this volume aims to breathe new life into a classic problem in philosophy by approaching it from a new perspective and exploring new areas of application. The book will be of interest to philosophers, psychologists, and anyone interested in the human capacity to doubt and to question our beliefs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
PublisherOxford University Press
Number of pages277
ISBN (Electronic)9780191983054
ISBN (Print)9780198871965
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2023

Keywords

  • Bayesian cognition
  • doubt
  • epistemology
  • Knowledge
  • obsessive-compulsive disorder
  • philosophy
  • sensitivity
  • skepticism
  • statistical evidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Arts and Humanities

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Why We Doubt: A Cognitive Account of Our Skeptical Inclinations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this