Who is (more) rational?

Syngjoo Choi, Shachar Kariv, Wieland Müller, Daniel Silverman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

110 Scopus citations


Revealed preference theory offers a criterion for decision-making quality: if decisions are high quality then there exists a utility function the choices maximize. We conduct a large-scale experiment to test for consistency with utility maximization. Consistency scores vary markedly within and across socioeconomic groups. In particular, consistency is strongly related to wealth: A standard deviation increase in consistency is associated with 15-19 percent more household wealth. This association is quantitatively robust to conditioning on correlates of unobserved constraints, preferences, and beliefs. Consistency with utility maximization under laboratory conditions thus captures decision-making ability that applies across domains and influences important real-world outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1518-1550
Number of pages33
JournalAmerican Economic Review
Issue number6
StatePublished - Jun 2014

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics


Dive into the research topics of 'Who is (more) rational?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this