TY - JOUR
T1 - The state of mapillary
T2 - An exploratory analysis
AU - Ma, Dawei
AU - Fan, Hongchao
AU - Li, Wenwen
AU - Ding, Xuan
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding: This work is supported by the NSFC (National Natural Science Foundation of China) project No. 41771484.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 by the authors.
PY - 2019/12/20
Y1 - 2019/12/20
N2 - As the world’s largest crowdsourcing-based street view platform, Mapillary has received considerable attention in both research and practical applications. By February 2019, more than 20,000 users worldwide contributed approximately 6.3 million kilometers of streetscape sequences. In this study, we attempted to get a deep insight into the Mapillary project through an exploratory analysis from the perspective of contributors, including the development of users, the spatiotemporal analysis of active users, the contribution modes (walking, cycling, and driving), and the devices used to contribute. It shows that inequality exists in the distribution of contributed users, similar to that in other volunteered geographic information (VGI) projects. However, the inequality in Mapillary contribution is less than in OpenStreetMap (OSM). Compared to OSM, the other main difference is that the data collection demonstrated obvious seasonal variation because contributions to OSM can be accomplished on a computer, whereas images have to be captured on the streets for Mapillary, and this is considerably affected by seasonal weather.
AB - As the world’s largest crowdsourcing-based street view platform, Mapillary has received considerable attention in both research and practical applications. By February 2019, more than 20,000 users worldwide contributed approximately 6.3 million kilometers of streetscape sequences. In this study, we attempted to get a deep insight into the Mapillary project through an exploratory analysis from the perspective of contributors, including the development of users, the spatiotemporal analysis of active users, the contribution modes (walking, cycling, and driving), and the devices used to contribute. It shows that inequality exists in the distribution of contributed users, similar to that in other volunteered geographic information (VGI) projects. However, the inequality in Mapillary contribution is less than in OpenStreetMap (OSM). Compared to OSM, the other main difference is that the data collection demonstrated obvious seasonal variation because contributions to OSM can be accomplished on a computer, whereas images have to be captured on the streets for Mapillary, and this is considerably affected by seasonal weather.
KW - Contribution behaviors
KW - Inequality
KW - Mapillary
KW - Volunteered geographic information (VGI)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077596731&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85077596731&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/ijgi9010010
DO - 10.3390/ijgi9010010
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85077596731
SN - 2220-9964
VL - 9
JO - ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
JF - ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
IS - 1
M1 - 10
ER -