TY - JOUR
T1 - The Road Not Taken
T2 - Fostering Research on the Psychology of Religiosity and Spirituality via Underused Representative, Open-Access Datasets (ROADs)
AU - Scott, Matthew J.
AU - Johnson, Kathryn A.
AU - Okun, Morris A
AU - Cohen, Adam B.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was conducted thanks to the generous support of the John Templeton Foundation (no. 60735). We thank our collaborators, Roger Finke and Christopher Bader, for their expertise and assistance in contacting the administrators of various open access data sets.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, © 2019 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2019/7/3
Y1 - 2019/7/3
N2 - Psychologists studying religiosity and spirituality (R/S) often face several challenges when conducting their research, such as collecting data from nationally representative samples, cross-cultural generalizability, statistical power, and integrated multilevel approaches. We examined one potential solution—the use of Representative, Open-Access Datasets (ROADs), which are currently underutilized. In this article, we define ROADs; discuss affordances, obstacles, and best practices in using them; document the R/S variables available in various waves of ongoing ROADs collection efforts; and delineate ways to increase usage of ROADs as a research tool in the future. This will enhance the capability of psychologists to address theory-driven questions and to better understand the role of R/S in everyday life, including social attitudes, health, and well-being, as well as social change, cohesion, and conflict. Looking forward, we recommend (a) adding more, and more nuanced, variables to future ROADs data collection efforts; (b) publishing more frequently using ROADs data; and (c) conducting workshops to promote the use of ROADs and to train researchers in secondary data analysis techniques.
AB - Psychologists studying religiosity and spirituality (R/S) often face several challenges when conducting their research, such as collecting data from nationally representative samples, cross-cultural generalizability, statistical power, and integrated multilevel approaches. We examined one potential solution—the use of Representative, Open-Access Datasets (ROADs), which are currently underutilized. In this article, we define ROADs; discuss affordances, obstacles, and best practices in using them; document the R/S variables available in various waves of ongoing ROADs collection efforts; and delineate ways to increase usage of ROADs as a research tool in the future. This will enhance the capability of psychologists to address theory-driven questions and to better understand the role of R/S in everyday life, including social attitudes, health, and well-being, as well as social change, cohesion, and conflict. Looking forward, we recommend (a) adding more, and more nuanced, variables to future ROADs data collection efforts; (b) publishing more frequently using ROADs data; and (c) conducting workshops to promote the use of ROADs and to train researchers in secondary data analysis techniques.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066130645&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066130645&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10508619.2019.1596000
DO - 10.1080/10508619.2019.1596000
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85066130645
SN - 1050-8619
VL - 29
SP - 204
EP - 221
JO - International Journal for the Psychology of Religion
JF - International Journal for the Psychology of Religion
IS - 3
ER -