TY - JOUR
T1 - The measurement of clinical pain intensity
T2 - a comparison of six methods
AU - Jensen, Mark P.
AU - Karoly, Paul
AU - Braver, Sanford
PY - 1986/10
Y1 - 1986/10
N2 - The measurement of subjective pain intensity continues to be important to both researchers and clinicians. Although several scales are currently used to assess the intensity construct, it remains unclear which of these provides the most precise, replicable, and predictively valid measure. Five criteria for judging intensity scales have been considered in previous research: (a) ease of administration of scoring; (b) relative rates of incorrect responding; (c) sensitivity as defined by the number of available response categories; (d) sensitivity as defined by statistical power; and (e) the magnitude of the relationship between each scale and a linear combination of pain intensity indices. In order to judge commonly used pain intensity measures, 75 chronic pain patients were asked to rate 4 kinds of pain (present, least, most, and average) using 6 scales. The utility and validity of the scales was judged using the criteria listed above. The results indicate that, for the present sample, the scales yield similar results in terms of the number of subjects who respond correctly to them and their predictive validity. However, when considering the remaining 3 criteria, the 101-point numerical rating scale appears to be the most practical index.
AB - The measurement of subjective pain intensity continues to be important to both researchers and clinicians. Although several scales are currently used to assess the intensity construct, it remains unclear which of these provides the most precise, replicable, and predictively valid measure. Five criteria for judging intensity scales have been considered in previous research: (a) ease of administration of scoring; (b) relative rates of incorrect responding; (c) sensitivity as defined by the number of available response categories; (d) sensitivity as defined by statistical power; and (e) the magnitude of the relationship between each scale and a linear combination of pain intensity indices. In order to judge commonly used pain intensity measures, 75 chronic pain patients were asked to rate 4 kinds of pain (present, least, most, and average) using 6 scales. The utility and validity of the scales was judged using the criteria listed above. The results indicate that, for the present sample, the scales yield similar results in terms of the number of subjects who respond correctly to them and their predictive validity. However, when considering the remaining 3 criteria, the 101-point numerical rating scale appears to be the most practical index.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022467080&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022467080&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0304-3959(86)90228-9
DO - 10.1016/0304-3959(86)90228-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 3785962
AN - SCOPUS:0022467080
SN - 0304-3959
VL - 27
SP - 117
EP - 126
JO - Pain
JF - Pain
IS - 1
ER -