TY - JOUR
T1 - The lecture machine
T2 - A cultural evolutionary model of pedagogy in higher education
AU - Grunspan, Daniel Z.
AU - Kline, Michelle Ann
AU - Brownell, Sara E.
N1 - Funding Information:
We acknowledge the support of a National Science Foundation IUSE grant (#1712188) and the John Templeton Foundation to the Institute of Human Origins at Arizona State University. The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the John Templeton Foundation. We thank members of the Biology Education Research Lab at Arizona State University for helpful feedback on an earlier draft and Sarah Eddy, Valerie Stout, Regis Komperda, and the reviewers for specific feedback.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 D. Z. Grunspan et al. CBE—Life Sciences Education and The American Society for Cell Biology.
PY - 2018/9/1
Y1 - 2018/9/1
N2 - The benefits of student-centered active-learning approaches are well established, but this evidence has not directly translated into instructors adopting these evidence-based methods in higher education. To date, promoting and sustaining pedagogical change through different initiatives has proven difficult, but research on pedagogical change is advancing. To this end, we examine pedagogical behaviors through a cultural evolutionary model that stresses the global nature of the issue, the generational time that change requires, and complications introduced by academic career trajectories. We first provide an introduction to cultural evolutionary theory before describing our model, which focuses on how cultural transmission processes and selection events at different career phases shape not only who teaches in higher education, but also how they choose to teach. We leverage our model to make suggestions for expediting change in higher education. This includes reforming pedagogy in departments that produce PhD students with the greatest chance of obtaining tenure-track positions.
AB - The benefits of student-centered active-learning approaches are well established, but this evidence has not directly translated into instructors adopting these evidence-based methods in higher education. To date, promoting and sustaining pedagogical change through different initiatives has proven difficult, but research on pedagogical change is advancing. To this end, we examine pedagogical behaviors through a cultural evolutionary model that stresses the global nature of the issue, the generational time that change requires, and complications introduced by academic career trajectories. We first provide an introduction to cultural evolutionary theory before describing our model, which focuses on how cultural transmission processes and selection events at different career phases shape not only who teaches in higher education, but also how they choose to teach. We leverage our model to make suggestions for expediting change in higher education. This includes reforming pedagogy in departments that produce PhD students with the greatest chance of obtaining tenure-track positions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054369327&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054369327&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1187/cbe.17-12-0287
DO - 10.1187/cbe.17-12-0287
M3 - Article
C2 - 29953324
AN - SCOPUS:85054369327
SN - 1931-7913
VL - 17
JO - CBE life sciences education
JF - CBE life sciences education
IS - 3
M1 - es6
ER -