TY - JOUR
T1 - The formal institutional context of informal entrepreneurship
T2 - a cross-national, configurational-based perspective
AU - Ault, Joshua K.
AU - Spicer, Andrew
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Center for International Business Education and Research (CIBER) at the Darla Moore School of Business, University of South Carolina as well as from The Thunderbird School of Global Management, Arizona State University.
Funding Information:
We thank Joao Albino-Pimentel, John Ault, Gerald McDermott, Kannan Ramaswamy, Ashley Spicer, Chris Yenkey, and the many participants who provided comments during presentations at the Darla Moore School of Business Frontiers in International Business Symposium, the Brigham Young University Informality Conference, the Imperial College Business School, and the Said Business School at the University of Oxford. We also thank Maryann Feldman and two anonymous reviewers for their help on this and earlier version of the manuscript. All mistakes are our own. This work was supported by the Center for International Business Education and Research (CIBER) at the Darla Moore School of Business, University of South Carolina as well as from The Thunderbird School of Global Management, Arizona State University.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - While previous comparative research has identified the formal institutional conditions that differentiate countries on their degree of informal entrepreneurship, this paper examines the characteristics that shape cross-national diversity in its type. Based on a series of fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analyses (fs/QCA) of 138 country cases, we find evidence of causal heterogeneity in the configuration of institutional conditions associated with entrepreneurial outcomes that are informal and growth-oriented and those that are informal and subsistence-oriented. Given our results, we propose that the formal institutional-based conditions that differentiate between types of informal sectors are best identified by the conjoint mixture of strength and weakness of state capabilities across multiple domains, rather than by uniform weakness, or voids, along all state functions. In our discussion, we explore the implication of our configurational-based findings for the comparative analysis of national systems of informal entrepreneurship and for the tailoring of policies to account for the multiple institutional-based pathways by which entrepreneurs come to enter into the informal economy.
AB - While previous comparative research has identified the formal institutional conditions that differentiate countries on their degree of informal entrepreneurship, this paper examines the characteristics that shape cross-national diversity in its type. Based on a series of fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analyses (fs/QCA) of 138 country cases, we find evidence of causal heterogeneity in the configuration of institutional conditions associated with entrepreneurial outcomes that are informal and growth-oriented and those that are informal and subsistence-oriented. Given our results, we propose that the formal institutional-based conditions that differentiate between types of informal sectors are best identified by the conjoint mixture of strength and weakness of state capabilities across multiple domains, rather than by uniform weakness, or voids, along all state functions. In our discussion, we explore the implication of our configurational-based findings for the comparative analysis of national systems of informal entrepreneurship and for the tailoring of policies to account for the multiple institutional-based pathways by which entrepreneurs come to enter into the informal economy.
KW - Developing country entrepreneurship
KW - Fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fs/qca)
KW - Informal economy
KW - State Fragility
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85097453123&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85097453123&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.respol.2020.104160
DO - 10.1016/j.respol.2020.104160
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85097453123
SN - 0048-7333
JO - Research Policy
JF - Research Policy
M1 - 104160
ER -