Abstract
Recently it was suggested (Bickel and Doksum 1981) that when data are used to select a transformation, the post-transformation analysis of those data may need to be modified considerably from standard form so as to allow for the selection. We argue that common sense and the work of Box and Cox (1964) point to a contrary conclusion. Our argument is based on considerations of parameter interpretation and subsequent Bayesian analysis, within the context of fitting normal-error linear models. Numerical examples are used to illustrate the main points.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 302-309 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Journal of the American Statistical Association |
| Volume | 79 |
| Issue number | 386 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jun 1984 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Bayesian inference
- Box-Cox model
- Confidence limits
- Contrasts
- Power transformation
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Statistics and Probability
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The analysis of transformed data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS