TY - JOUR
T1 - Temporal prediction errors in a passive learning task activate human striatum
AU - McClure, Samuel M.
AU - Berns, Gregory S.
AU - Montague, P. Read
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to thank Megan Martin, Giuseppe Pagnoni, and Mike Wiest for their assistance with this experiment. Additionally, we benefited greatly from discussions with Ron Fisher and Peter Dayan. This work was supported by grants from the Kane Family Foundation (P.R.M.) and the National Institutes for Health RO1 MH52797 (P.R.M.), RO1 DA11723 (P.R.M.), RO1 MH61010 (G.S.B.), and K08 DA00367 (G.S.B.).
PY - 2003/4/24
Y1 - 2003/4/24
N2 - Functional MRI experiments in human subjects strongly suggest that the striatum participates in processing information about the predictability of rewarding stimuli. However, stimuli can be unpredictable in character (what stimulus arrives next), unpredictable in time (when the stimulus arrives), and unpredictable in amount (how much arrives). These variables have not been dissociated in previous imaging work in humans, thus conflating possible interpretations of the kinds of expectation errors driving the measured brain responses. Using a passive conditioning task and fMRI in human subjects, we show that positive and negative prediction errors in reward delivery time correlate with BOLD changes in human striatum, with the strongest activation lateralized to the left putamen. For the negative prediction error, the brain response was elicited by expectations only and not by stimuli presented directly; that is, we measured the brain response to nothing delivered (juice expected but not delivered) contrasted with nothing delivered (nothing expected).
AB - Functional MRI experiments in human subjects strongly suggest that the striatum participates in processing information about the predictability of rewarding stimuli. However, stimuli can be unpredictable in character (what stimulus arrives next), unpredictable in time (when the stimulus arrives), and unpredictable in amount (how much arrives). These variables have not been dissociated in previous imaging work in humans, thus conflating possible interpretations of the kinds of expectation errors driving the measured brain responses. Using a passive conditioning task and fMRI in human subjects, we show that positive and negative prediction errors in reward delivery time correlate with BOLD changes in human striatum, with the strongest activation lateralized to the left putamen. For the negative prediction error, the brain response was elicited by expectations only and not by stimuli presented directly; that is, we measured the brain response to nothing delivered (juice expected but not delivered) contrasted with nothing delivered (nothing expected).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037650217&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037650217&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00154-5
DO - 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00154-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 12718866
AN - SCOPUS:0037650217
SN - 0896-6273
VL - 38
SP - 339
EP - 346
JO - Neuron
JF - Neuron
IS - 2
ER -