Abstract
Most everyday arguments are informal, as contrasted with the formal arguments of logic and mathematics. Whereas formal argument is well understood, the nature of informal argument is more elusive. A recent study by Rips (2002) provides further evidence regarding the roles of structure and pragmatics in informal argument.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 147-149 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | Trends in Cognitive Sciences |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Apr 1 2003 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Cognitive Neuroscience
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Structure and pragmatics in informal argument: Circularity and question-begging'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS