Soiling, cleaning, and abrasion: The results of the 5-year photovoltaic glass coating field study

Joanna Bomber, Asher Einhorn, Chaiwat Engtrakul, Clare Lanaghan, Jeffrey Linger, Leonardo Micheli, David C. Miller, Joshua Morse, Helio Moutinho, Matthew Muller, Jimmy M. Newkirk, Lin Simpson, Bobby To, Sarah Toth, Telia Curtis, Fang Li, Govindasamy Tamizhmani, Sai Tatapudi, Vivian Alberts, Aaesha Al NuaimiPedro Banda, Jim J. John, Gerhard Mathiak, Ahmad O.M. Safieh, Marco Stefancich, Bader Alabdulrazzaq, Ayman Al-Qattan, Sonali Bhaduri, Anil Kottantharayil, Ben Bourne, Zoe deFreitas, Fabrizio Farina, Greg Kimball, Adam Hoffman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

External contamination (“soiling”) of the incident surface is a major limiting factor for solar technologies. A 5-year field glass coupon study was conducted to better understand external contamination and its effects; compare cleaning methods and the use of preventative coatings; and explore the abrasion resulting from cleaning to advise on accelerated abrasion testing. Test sites included the cities of Dubai (UAE), Kuwait City (Kuwait), Mesa (AZ), Mumbai (India), and Sacramento (CA). Through the 5-year cumulative study, dry brush, water spray, and wet sponge and squeegee cleaning methods were compared to no cleaning. Optical microscopy was used to obtain images, including representative color images, grayscale images for object analysis, and oblique images for coating integrity assessment. A thresholding protocol was developed to analyze and distinguish specimens using the ImageJ software. Optical performance was quantified using a spectrophotometer, including comprehensive optical characterization (transmittance, reflectance, and absorptance in addition to forward- and back-scattering). Atomic force microscopy was used to verify the abrasion damage morphology, including the width and depth of surface scratches. Analysis of the results included correlation of optical performance and particle area coverage, rank order (by coating or location), and the acceleration factor for abrasion damage. The efficacy of external cleaning was more readily distinguished from the effectiveness of antisoiling coatings. The acceleration factor for dry brush cleaning of a porous silica coating was found to be on the order of unity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number113035
JournalSolar Energy Materials and Solar Cells
Volume275
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 15 2024

Keywords

  • Antireflective (AR) coating
  • Antisoiling (AS) coating
  • Atomic force microscopy (AFM)
  • Cleaning
  • Contamination density
  • Durability
  • ImageJ
  • Optical performance
  • PV quality assurance task force (PVQAT)
  • Particulate matter
  • Soiling
  • Surface abrasion
  • Surface coverage

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Soiling, cleaning, and abrasion: The results of the 5-year photovoltaic glass coating field study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this