Silent Covenants and Structural Barriers: State Standards Committees and the Maintenance of Race-Evasive Social Studies Standards

Christopher C. Martell, Lauren Mc Arthur Harris, J’Shon Lee, Jennifer P. Chalmers, Jami Carmichael

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In this qualitative study, researchers used critical race theory to examine the experiences of social studies standards committee members in 18 states and the District of Columbia. They found that while many participants articulated goals of increasing the teaching of race and racism in their state’s social studies standards, at least in part, numerous silent covenants and structural barriers existed to maintain the status quo through race-evasive standards. A smaller group of participants generally avoided advocating for race and racism topics altogether due to their perceived controversial or political status, while others did not mention race or racism as a priority. Recommendations are made for both the policy and practice related to state standards creation, and questions are raised about the ability of social studies standards to foster a racially just social studies curriculum.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAERA Open
Volume10
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2024

Keywords

  • curriculum
  • qualitative research
  • race
  • social studies education
  • standard setting

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Silent Covenants and Structural Barriers: State Standards Committees and the Maintenance of Race-Evasive Social Studies Standards'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this