TY - JOUR
T1 - Serological profiling of Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis patients reveals anti-microbial antibody signatures
AU - Shome, Mahasish
AU - Song, Lusheng
AU - Williams, Stacy
AU - Chung, Yunro
AU - Murugan, Vel
AU - Park, Jin G.
AU - Faubion, William
AU - Pasha, Shabana F.
AU - Leighton, Jonathan A.
AU - LaBaer, Joshua
AU - Qiu, Ji
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank Jessica Friton for her help with patient sample and data acquisition. The authors would like to thank Shehzad Sheikh for helpful suggestions to improve the manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/8/14
Y1 - 2022/8/14
N2 - BACKGROUND The healthcare burden of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is rising globally and there are limited non-invasive biomarkers for accurate and early diagnosis. AIM To understand the important role that intestinal microbiota play in IBD pathogenesis and identify anti-microbial antibody signatures that benefit clinical management of IBD patients. METHODS We performed serological profiling of 100 Crohn’s disease (CD) patients, 100 ulcerative colitis (UC) patients and 100 healthy controls against 1173 bacterial and 397 viral proteins from 50 bacteria and 33 viruses on protein microarrays. The study subjects were randomly divided into discovery (n = 150) and validation (n = 150) sets. Statistical analysis was performed using R packages. RESULTS Anti-bacterial antibody responses showed greater differential prevalence among the three subject groups than anti-viral antibody responses. We identified novel antibodies against the antigens of Bacteroidetes vulgatus (BVU_0562) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (SP_1992) showing higher prevalence in CD patients relative to healthy controls. We also identified antibodies against the antigen of Streptococcus pyogenes (SPy_2009) showing higher prevalence in healthy controls relative to UC patients. Using these novel antibodies, we built biomarker panels with area under the curve (AUC) of 0.81, 0.87, and 0.82 distinguishing CD vs control, UC vs control, and CD vs UC, respectively. Subgroup analysis revealed that penetrating CD behavior, colonic CD location, CD patients with a history of surgery, and extensive UC exhibited highest antibody prevalence among all patients. We demonstrated that autoantibodies and anti-microbial antibodies in CD patients had minimal correlation. CONCLUSION We have identified antibody signatures for CD and UC using a comprehensive analysis of antimicrobial antibody response in IBD. These antibodies and the source microorganisms of their target antigens improve our understanding of the role of specific microorganisms in IBD pathogenesis and, after future validation, should aid early and accurate diagnosis of IBD.
AB - BACKGROUND The healthcare burden of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is rising globally and there are limited non-invasive biomarkers for accurate and early diagnosis. AIM To understand the important role that intestinal microbiota play in IBD pathogenesis and identify anti-microbial antibody signatures that benefit clinical management of IBD patients. METHODS We performed serological profiling of 100 Crohn’s disease (CD) patients, 100 ulcerative colitis (UC) patients and 100 healthy controls against 1173 bacterial and 397 viral proteins from 50 bacteria and 33 viruses on protein microarrays. The study subjects were randomly divided into discovery (n = 150) and validation (n = 150) sets. Statistical analysis was performed using R packages. RESULTS Anti-bacterial antibody responses showed greater differential prevalence among the three subject groups than anti-viral antibody responses. We identified novel antibodies against the antigens of Bacteroidetes vulgatus (BVU_0562) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (SP_1992) showing higher prevalence in CD patients relative to healthy controls. We also identified antibodies against the antigen of Streptococcus pyogenes (SPy_2009) showing higher prevalence in healthy controls relative to UC patients. Using these novel antibodies, we built biomarker panels with area under the curve (AUC) of 0.81, 0.87, and 0.82 distinguishing CD vs control, UC vs control, and CD vs UC, respectively. Subgroup analysis revealed that penetrating CD behavior, colonic CD location, CD patients with a history of surgery, and extensive UC exhibited highest antibody prevalence among all patients. We demonstrated that autoantibodies and anti-microbial antibodies in CD patients had minimal correlation. CONCLUSION We have identified antibody signatures for CD and UC using a comprehensive analysis of antimicrobial antibody response in IBD. These antibodies and the source microorganisms of their target antigens improve our understanding of the role of specific microorganisms in IBD pathogenesis and, after future validation, should aid early and accurate diagnosis of IBD.
KW - Anti-microbial antibody
KW - Crohn’s disease
KW - Gut microbiome
KW - Inflammatory bowel disease
KW - Protein microarray
KW - Ulcerative colitis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85136534710&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85136534710&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3748/wjg.v28.i30.4089
DO - 10.3748/wjg.v28.i30.4089
M3 - Article
C2 - 36157118
AN - SCOPUS:85136534710
SN - 1007-9327
VL - 28
SP - 4089
EP - 4101
JO - World journal of gastroenterology
JF - World journal of gastroenterology
IS - 30
ER -