Self‐Generated Performance Feedback in Interviewing Training

Sharon Kurpius; De WAYNE J KURPIUS; THOMAS C. FROEHLE

doi:10.1002/j.1556-6978.1976.tb02016.x

Self‐Generated Performance Feedback in Interviewing Training

Sharon Kurpius, De WAYNE J KURPIUS, THOMAS C. FROEHLE

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

The present study examined the effect of self‐generated performance feedback, of expert performance feedback, and of no performance feedback on novice counselor trainee's production of counselor tacting response leads (CTRLs). Self‐generated performance feedback consisted of the participants responding to a video‐taped client and then orally evaluating their own response on the basis of a performance standard. Expert performance feedback consisted of verbal feedback from a designated expert given over a bug‐in‐the‐ear apparatus. Analysis of four measures of CTRLs revealed no differences resulting from either source of feedback—self or expert—however, those who received feedback outperformed the controls. These differences were maintained over a short time span. 1976 American Counseling Association

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	91-100
Number of pages	10
Journal	Counselor Education and Supervision
Volume	19
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6978.1976.tb02016.x
State	Published - Dec 1976

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Education
Developmental and Educational Psychology
Clinical Psychology

Access to Document

10.1002/j.1556-6978.1976.tb02016.x

Cite this

@article{2a37146bc04e4a1d869c483e00f36ede,

title = "Self‐Generated Performance Feedback in Interviewing Training",

abstract = "The present study examined the effect of self‐generated performance feedback, of expert performance feedback, and of no performance feedback on novice counselor trainee's production of counselor tacting response leads (CTRLs). Self‐generated performance feedback consisted of the participants responding to a video‐taped client and then orally evaluating their own response on the basis of a performance standard. Expert performance feedback consisted of verbal feedback from a designated expert given over a bug‐in‐the‐ear apparatus. Analysis of four measures of CTRLs revealed no differences resulting from either source of feedback—self or expert—however, those who received feedback outperformed the controls. These differences were maintained over a short time span. 1976 American Counseling Association",

author = "Sharon Kurpius and KURPIUS, {De WAYNE J} and FROEHLE, {THOMAS C.}",

year = "1976",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1002/j.1556-6978.1976.tb02016.x",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "19",

pages = "91--100",

journal = "Counselor Education and Supervision",

issn = "0011-0035",

publisher = "American Counseling Association",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Self‐Generated Performance Feedback in Interviewing Training

AU - Kurpius, Sharon

AU - KURPIUS, De WAYNE J

AU - FROEHLE, THOMAS C.

PY - 1976/12

Y1 - 1976/12

N2 - The present study examined the effect of self‐generated performance feedback, of expert performance feedback, and of no performance feedback on novice counselor trainee's production of counselor tacting response leads (CTRLs). Self‐generated performance feedback consisted of the participants responding to a video‐taped client and then orally evaluating their own response on the basis of a performance standard. Expert performance feedback consisted of verbal feedback from a designated expert given over a bug‐in‐the‐ear apparatus. Analysis of four measures of CTRLs revealed no differences resulting from either source of feedback—self or expert—however, those who received feedback outperformed the controls. These differences were maintained over a short time span. 1976 American Counseling Association

AB - The present study examined the effect of self‐generated performance feedback, of expert performance feedback, and of no performance feedback on novice counselor trainee's production of counselor tacting response leads (CTRLs). Self‐generated performance feedback consisted of the participants responding to a video‐taped client and then orally evaluating their own response on the basis of a performance standard. Expert performance feedback consisted of verbal feedback from a designated expert given over a bug‐in‐the‐ear apparatus. Analysis of four measures of CTRLs revealed no differences resulting from either source of feedback—self or expert—however, those who received feedback outperformed the controls. These differences were maintained over a short time span. 1976 American Counseling Association

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84990420849&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84990420849&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/j.1556-6978.1976.tb02016.x

DO - 10.1002/j.1556-6978.1976.tb02016.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84990420849

SN - 0011-0035

VL - 19

SP - 91

EP - 100

JO - Counselor Education and Supervision

JF - Counselor Education and Supervision

IS - 2

ER -

Self‐Generated Performance Feedback in Interviewing Training

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this