Self-Explanation: Enriching a Situation Model or Repairing a Domain Model?

Nicholas de Leeuw, Michelene T.H. Chi

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

23 Scopus citations


When people are reading a difficult text, one of the things they may do is talk themselves through the difficulty. That is, they might start explaining to themselves the parts they do understand, try to think of related knowledge that might help them understand the rest, and/or make an effort to problem-solve the gaps in their understanding. These efforts by readers to explain a text to themselves are what we call self-explanation (Chi and Bassok, 1989). Because self-explanation is directed toward a goal (understanding the text, or what the text describes), and requires conscious thought and effort, we think of it as an intentional strategy on the part of the reader. In this chapter, we consider the process of self-explanation in the context of two accounts of learning from a text, the Mental Model Revision view of Chi (2000) and the ConstructionIntegration model (Kintsch, 1998). Although there are some core similarities between these accounts of how readers combine old and new knowledge, they do yield some different predictions about intentional processes in general and selfexplanation in particular. Some evidence that speaks to these differences is presented in the latter half of the chapter.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationIntentional Conceptual Change
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Number of pages24
ISBN (Electronic)9781135648923
ISBN (Print)0805838252
StatePublished - Jan 1 2003
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)


Dive into the research topics of 'Self-Explanation: Enriching a Situation Model or Repairing a Domain Model?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this