TY - JOUR
T1 - Science for managing ecosystem services
T2 - Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment
AU - Carpenter, Stephen R.
AU - Mooney, Harold A.
AU - Agard, John
AU - Capistrano, Doris
AU - Defries, Ruth S.
AU - Diaz, Sandra
AU - Dietz, Thomas
AU - Duraiappah, Anantha K.
AU - Oteng-Yeboah, Alfred
AU - Pereira, Henrique Miguel
AU - Perrings, Charles
AU - Reid, Walter V.
AU - Sarukhan, Jose
AU - Scholes, Robert J.
AU - Whyte, Anne
PY - 2009/2/3
Y1 - 2009/2/3
N2 - The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA) introduced a new framework for analyzing social-ecological systems that has had wide influence in the policy and scientific communities. Studies after the MA are taking up new challenges in the basic science needed to assess, project, and manage flows of ecosystem services and effects on human well-being. Yet, our ability to draw general conclusions remains limited by focus on discipline-bound sectors of the full social-ecological system. At the same time, some polices and practices intended to improve ecosystem services and human well-being are based on untested assumptions and sparse information. The people who are affected and those who provide resources are increasingly asking for evidence that interventions improve ecosystem services and human well-being. New research is needed that considers the full ensemble of processes and feedbacks, for a range of biophysical and social systems, to better understand and manage the dynamics of the relationship between humans and the ecosystems on which they rely. Such research will expand the capacity to address fundamental questions about complex social- ecological systems while evaluating assumptions of policies and practices intended to advance human well-being through improved ecosystem services.
AB - The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA) introduced a new framework for analyzing social-ecological systems that has had wide influence in the policy and scientific communities. Studies after the MA are taking up new challenges in the basic science needed to assess, project, and manage flows of ecosystem services and effects on human well-being. Yet, our ability to draw general conclusions remains limited by focus on discipline-bound sectors of the full social-ecological system. At the same time, some polices and practices intended to improve ecosystem services and human well-being are based on untested assumptions and sparse information. The people who are affected and those who provide resources are increasingly asking for evidence that interventions improve ecosystem services and human well-being. New research is needed that considers the full ensemble of processes and feedbacks, for a range of biophysical and social systems, to better understand and manage the dynamics of the relationship between humans and the ecosystems on which they rely. Such research will expand the capacity to address fundamental questions about complex social- ecological systems while evaluating assumptions of policies and practices intended to advance human well-being through improved ecosystem services.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=60849112834&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=60849112834&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1073/pnas.0808772106
DO - 10.1073/pnas.0808772106
M3 - Review article
C2 - 19179280
AN - SCOPUS:60849112834
SN - 0027-8424
VL - 106
SP - 1305
EP - 1312
JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
IS - 5
ER -