TY - JOUR
T1 - Retrospective sampling
T2 - A planning tool for field programs
AU - Irvine, James R.
AU - Chen, Din
AU - Schnute, Jon T.
PY - 2003/8/1
Y1 - 2003/8/1
N2 - Retrospective sampling can help fishery scientists improve the cost-effectiveness of field sampling programs. This technique uses historical data gathered intensively from a few sites to set realistic future sampling goals. We illustrate the method with 10 years of salmon smolt emigration data from three streams in British Columbia, Canada. When we used data from one-third to one-half the days actually sampled during each run, the error associated with individual annual estimates rarely exceeded 30%. Our mean 10-year abundance estimates were never significantly different from the true numbers, regardless of sampling effort, indicating that estimates were unbiased. Although errors were highest with infrequent sampling, the incremental gains achieved by sampling more than half of each run were small. In retrospect, a reduced sampling effort in each stream would have created an opportunity to examine more than three streams with the same sampling effort, and may have achieved a better balance between sample size and habitat coverage.
AB - Retrospective sampling can help fishery scientists improve the cost-effectiveness of field sampling programs. This technique uses historical data gathered intensively from a few sites to set realistic future sampling goals. We illustrate the method with 10 years of salmon smolt emigration data from three streams in British Columbia, Canada. When we used data from one-third to one-half the days actually sampled during each run, the error associated with individual annual estimates rarely exceeded 30%. Our mean 10-year abundance estimates were never significantly different from the true numbers, regardless of sampling effort, indicating that estimates were unbiased. Although errors were highest with infrequent sampling, the incremental gains achieved by sampling more than half of each run were small. In retrospect, a reduced sampling effort in each stream would have created an opportunity to examine more than three streams with the same sampling effort, and may have achieved a better balance between sample size and habitat coverage.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0042880011&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0042880011&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1577/1548-8446(2003)28[25:RS]2.0.CO;2
DO - 10.1577/1548-8446(2003)28[25:RS]2.0.CO;2
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:0042880011
SN - 0363-2415
VL - 28
SP - 25
EP - 30
JO - Fisheries
JF - Fisheries
IS - 8
ER -