TY - JOUR
T1 - Religion and the Morality of Positive Mentality
AU - Cohen, Adam B.
AU - Rankin, Amy
N1 - Funding Information:
Aspects of data analysis and writing were supported by NIA Grant AG00029 and a Templeton Foundation Positive Psychology Young Scholars grant, both to Adam Cohen. Thanks to Jon Baron and J. A. Skelton for comments on this article, and thanks to the Rev. John Michio Miyahara, Dickinson College Director of Religious Life and Community Service, for helping to advertise the survey in Study 3. The views expressed do not necessarily represent those of the NIA or of the John Templeton Foundation.
PY - 2004
Y1 - 2004
N2 - Previous research by Cohen and Rozin showed that Jews are much less moralizing of negative mental states than Protestants. Two alternative, theologically derived interpretations of this finding are that Jews, relative to Protestants: (a) are less attentive to both negative and positive mental states, or (b) are less attentive to negative mental states, but equally attentive to positive ones. In Studies 1 and 2, we presented Jewish and Protestant participants with vignettes about a person considering virtuous actions, and both groups gave a high degree of moral credit for such thoughts. In Study 3, we presented Jewish and Christian participants with 2 vignettes, 1 about a person considering a virtuous action and another about a different person considering an immoral action. Jews and Christians differed strongly in their moral evaluations of the person considering the immoral action, but were very similar in their moral evaluations of the person considering a virtuous action. Study 4 described an actor who helped another person partly for selfish reasons. For Protestants, this selfish motivation invalidated the moral quality of the action, but not for Jews. These studies point to complexity in the differential attention that Jews and Christians pay to positive and negative mental events, and motivations for actions.
AB - Previous research by Cohen and Rozin showed that Jews are much less moralizing of negative mental states than Protestants. Two alternative, theologically derived interpretations of this finding are that Jews, relative to Protestants: (a) are less attentive to both negative and positive mental states, or (b) are less attentive to negative mental states, but equally attentive to positive ones. In Studies 1 and 2, we presented Jewish and Protestant participants with vignettes about a person considering virtuous actions, and both groups gave a high degree of moral credit for such thoughts. In Study 3, we presented Jewish and Christian participants with 2 vignettes, 1 about a person considering a virtuous action and another about a different person considering an immoral action. Jews and Christians differed strongly in their moral evaluations of the person considering the immoral action, but were very similar in their moral evaluations of the person considering a virtuous action. Study 4 described an actor who helped another person partly for selfish reasons. For Protestants, this selfish motivation invalidated the moral quality of the action, but not for Jews. These studies point to complexity in the differential attention that Jews and Christians pay to positive and negative mental events, and motivations for actions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2442430361&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2442430361&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1207/s15324834basp2601_5
DO - 10.1207/s15324834basp2601_5
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:2442430361
SN - 0197-3533
VL - 26
SP - 45
EP - 57
JO - Basic and Applied Social Psychology
JF - Basic and Applied Social Psychology
IS - 1
ER -