TY - JOUR
T1 - Reconceptualising the role of teachers as assessors
T2 - teacher assessment identity
AU - Looney, Anne
AU - Cumming, Joy
AU - van Der Kleij, Fabienne
AU - Harris, Karen
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the National Council for Curriculum and Assessment, Dublin and the Australian Research Council Discovery Program [Project 15010169].
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, © 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2018/9/3
Y1 - 2018/9/3
N2 - Teachers’ capabilities to conduct classroom assessment and use assessment evidence are central to quality assessment practice, traditionally conceptualised as assessment literacy. In this paper we present, firstly, an expanded conceptualisation of teachers’ assessment work. Drawing on research on teacher identity, we posit that teachers’ identity as professionals, beliefs about assessment, disposition towards enacting assessment, and perceptions of their role as assessors are all significant for their assessment work. We term this reconceptualisation Teacher Assessment Identity (TAI). Secondly, in support of this conceptual work, we present findings from a systematic review of self-report scales on teacher assessment literacy and teacher identity related to assessment. The findings demonstrate that such scales and previous research exploring teacher assessment practices have paid limited attention to what we identify as essential and broader dimensions of TAI. We share our reconceptualisation and analyses to encourage others to consider teacher assessment work more broadly in their research.
AB - Teachers’ capabilities to conduct classroom assessment and use assessment evidence are central to quality assessment practice, traditionally conceptualised as assessment literacy. In this paper we present, firstly, an expanded conceptualisation of teachers’ assessment work. Drawing on research on teacher identity, we posit that teachers’ identity as professionals, beliefs about assessment, disposition towards enacting assessment, and perceptions of their role as assessors are all significant for their assessment work. We term this reconceptualisation Teacher Assessment Identity (TAI). Secondly, in support of this conceptual work, we present findings from a systematic review of self-report scales on teacher assessment literacy and teacher identity related to assessment. The findings demonstrate that such scales and previous research exploring teacher assessment practices have paid limited attention to what we identify as essential and broader dimensions of TAI. We share our reconceptualisation and analyses to encourage others to consider teacher assessment work more broadly in their research.
KW - Teacher identity
KW - assessment identity
KW - assessment literacy
KW - teachers’ work
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85008223842&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85008223842&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/0969594X.2016.1268090
DO - 10.1080/0969594X.2016.1268090
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85008223842
SN - 0969-594X
VL - 25
SP - 442
EP - 467
JO - Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice
JF - Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice
IS - 5
ER -