Quality assurance and improvement practice in mental health agencies: Roles, activities, targets and contributions

Curtis McMillen, Luis E. Zayas, Samantha Books, Madeline Lee

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    17 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    Accompanying the rise in the number of mental health agency personnel tasked with quality assurance and improvement (QA/I) responsibilities is an increased need to understand the nature of the work these professionals undertake. Four aspects of the work of quality assurance and improvement (QA/I) professionals in mental health were explored in this qualitative study: their perceived roles, their major activities, their QA/I targets, and their contributions. In-person interviews were conducted with QA/I professionals at 16 mental health agencies. Respondents perceived their roles at varying levels of complexity, focused on different targets, and used different methods to conduct their work. Few targets of QA/I work served as indicators of high quality care. Most QA/I professionals provided concrete descriptions of how they had improved agency services, while others could describe none. Accreditation framed much of agency QA/I work, perhaps to its detriment.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)458-467
    Number of pages10
    JournalAdministration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
    Volume35
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Nov 2008

    Keywords

    • Accreditation
    • Quality
    • Quality assurance
    • Quality improvement

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Phychiatric Mental Health
    • Health Policy
    • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
    • Psychiatry and Mental health

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Quality assurance and improvement practice in mental health agencies: Roles, activities, targets and contributions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this