Publication of Rind et al. (1998): The editors' perspective

Kenneth J. Sher, Nancy Eisenberg

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations


The authors address several issues surrounding the B. Rind, P. Tromovitch, and R. Bauserman (1998) meta-analysis on the long-term effects of childhood sexual abuse from their perspective as the editors who accepted the manuscript for publication. In particular, they discuss the appropriateness of their editorial decision, the appropriateness of a policy of considering authors' prior publications in editorial decisions (as suggested by some critics), and the editors' role in the specific recommendations made by B. Rind et al. They go on to consider actions they could have taken to minimize the mischaracterizations of the study's findings and conclusions and their views of the American Psychological Association's actions with respect to the authors personally and to society more generally.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)206-210
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Psychologist
Issue number3
StatePublished - Jan 1 2002

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)


Dive into the research topics of 'Publication of Rind et al. (1998): The editors' perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this