TY - JOUR
T1 - Psychometric and Evidentiary Advances, Opportunities, and Challenges for Simulation-Based Assessment
AU - Levy, Roy
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported in part by the K-12 Center at ETS and is based on a report published in connection with their invitational research symposium on technology enhanced assessments; I wish to thank the K-12 Center at ETS for their support of this work. I wish to thank my current and past collaborators at Cisco, Pearson, ETS, the University of Maryland, WestED, CRESST, Arizona State University, and MW Productions, with whom I have had the pleasure of working on simulation-based assessments. I also wish to think Jim Pellegrino, Ernest Rakow, and two anonymous reviewers for helpful suggestions on earlier versions of this article.
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - This article characterizes the advances, opportunities, and challenges for psychometrics of simulation-based assessments through a lens that views assessment as evidentiary reasoning. Simulation-based tasks offer the prospect for student experiences that differ from traditional assessment. Such tasks may be used to support evidentiary arguments that differ considerably from those typical in assessment. These novel assessment arguments are richer or more nuanced than those commonly used in terms of the targeted inferences about students, the evidence that facilitates those inferences, and the tasks that allow for the collection of such evidence. Driving principles of assessment are reviewed, and their implications for specifying student, task, and evidence models for simulation-based assessments are described. Potential pitfalls in these and related aspects of the assessment development process are described. Strategies for solutions to some of the more imminent challenges to psychometrics for simulations are discussed.
AB - This article characterizes the advances, opportunities, and challenges for psychometrics of simulation-based assessments through a lens that views assessment as evidentiary reasoning. Simulation-based tasks offer the prospect for student experiences that differ from traditional assessment. Such tasks may be used to support evidentiary arguments that differ considerably from those typical in assessment. These novel assessment arguments are richer or more nuanced than those commonly used in terms of the targeted inferences about students, the evidence that facilitates those inferences, and the tasks that allow for the collection of such evidence. Driving principles of assessment are reviewed, and their implications for specifying student, task, and evidence models for simulation-based assessments are described. Potential pitfalls in these and related aspects of the assessment development process are described. Strategies for solutions to some of the more imminent challenges to psychometrics for simulations are discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883522517&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84883522517&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10627197.2013.814517
DO - 10.1080/10627197.2013.814517
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84883522517
SN - 1062-7197
VL - 18
SP - 182
EP - 207
JO - Educational Assessment
JF - Educational Assessment
IS - 3
ER -