Robert M. Cook-Deegan, M.D., of the Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University, looks at several new attempts to forge workable policy on participation in clinical brain research and warns that another unresolved clash of interests will produce only victims. Although the issues are complex, says Cook-Deegan, there is ample common ground. He recommends some principles that could help to end the costly stalemate.
|Number of pages
|Cerebrum : the Dana forum on brain science
|Published - Jan 1 2000
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Medicine