Positive bias in the ‘Trust in Automated Systems Survey’? An examination of the Jian et al. (2000) scale

Robert S. Gutzwiller, Erin K. Chiou, Scotty D. Craig, Christina M. Lewis, Glenn J. Lematta, Chi Ping Hsiung

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articlepeer-review

31 Scopus citations

Abstract

Measuring trust in technology is a mainstay in Human Factors research. While trust may not perfectly predict reliance on technology or compliance with alarm signals, it is routinely used as a design consideration and assessment goalpost. Several methods of measuring trust have been employed in the past decades, but one self-report measure stands out due to its popular use, the Trust in Automated Systems Survey (Jian, Bisantz, & Drury, 2000). We conducted a study to assess whether the survey could create biased responses, and found evidence the original scale is in fact skewed toward positive ratings. Assessing the literature revealed the survey has been used in unaltered form across at least 100 different reports and remains frequently administered - therefore, the potential impact of this bias may be widespread. Future directions, considerations, and caveats for our assessment, and for using this scale, are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)217-221
Number of pages5
JournalProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Volume63
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2019
Event63rd International Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, HFES 2019 - Seattle, United States
Duration: Oct 28 2019Nov 1 2019

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Positive bias in the ‘Trust in Automated Systems Survey’? An examination of the Jian et al. (2000) scale'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this