TY - JOUR
T1 - Personal noise exposure assessment of Kuwaiti printing industry workers
AU - Alabdulhadi, Abdullah
AU - Devey, Peter
AU - Boggess, May
AU - Guest, Maya
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors wish to thank all managers of printeries and their workers for their valuable time, effort and contribution to this study, without whose support this study would not have been possible. The research was generously funded by the Government of Kuwait represented by the Public Authority for Applied Education and Training (PAAET).
Funding Information:
This work was supported by Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research; Kuwait Public Authority for Applied Education and Training. The authors wish to thank all managers of printeries and their workers for their valuable time, effort and contribution to this study, without whose support this study would not have been possible. The research was generously funded by the Government of Kuwait represented by the Public Authority for Applied Education and Training (PAAET).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Central Institute for Labour Protection–National Research Institute (CIOP-PIB).
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Recent technological improvements in the printing industry may have altered noise exposures in printeries. Of the eight printery noise assessments published since 2000, none assessed the exposure of workers using computer-to-plate machines and only two used personal noise dosimetry. This method measures noise levels as the worker moves about and permits examination of the impulsiveness of noise levels. In this study, 104 workers wore personal noise dosimeters for one full shift. Computer-to-plate operators experienced noise exposures of 75 dB(A) on average and were rarely exposed to noise levels greater than 85 dB(A). Noise exposure in excess of 85 dB(A) was still common among offset printer operators. In fact, all workers operating web-fed offset machines spent more than half the shift experiencing noise levels greater than 85 dB(A). We found that the 5-min rolling SD of noise levels accurately reflected the impulsivity observed in the noise level profile.
AB - Recent technological improvements in the printing industry may have altered noise exposures in printeries. Of the eight printery noise assessments published since 2000, none assessed the exposure of workers using computer-to-plate machines and only two used personal noise dosimetry. This method measures noise levels as the worker moves about and permits examination of the impulsiveness of noise levels. In this study, 104 workers wore personal noise dosimeters for one full shift. Computer-to-plate operators experienced noise exposures of 75 dB(A) on average and were rarely exposed to noise levels greater than 85 dB(A). Noise exposure in excess of 85 dB(A) was still common among offset printer operators. In fact, all workers operating web-fed offset machines spent more than half the shift experiencing noise levels greater than 85 dB(A). We found that the 5-min rolling SD of noise levels accurately reflected the impulsivity observed in the noise level profile.
KW - occupational noise exposure recommendations
KW - personal noise dosimetry
KW - printing industry
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077062210&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85077062210&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10803548.2019.1677327
DO - 10.1080/10803548.2019.1677327
M3 - Article
C2 - 31594479
AN - SCOPUS:85077062210
SN - 1080-3548
VL - 27
SP - 578
EP - 588
JO - International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics
JF - International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics
IS - 2
ER -