TY - JOUR
T1 - Performance and Relative Risk Dynamics during Driving Simulation Tasks under Distinct Automation Conditions
AU - Rodriguez, Lucero Rodriguez
AU - Orellana, Carlos Bustamante
AU - Gremillion, Gregory M.
AU - Huang, Lixiao
AU - Demir, Mustafa
AU - Cooke, Nancy
AU - Metcalfe, Jason S.
AU - Amazeen, Polemnia G.
AU - Kang, Yun
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 by Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Risk has been a key factor influencing trust in Human-Automation interactions, though there is no unified tool to study its dynamics. We provide a framework for defining and assessing relative risk of automation usage through performance dynamics and apply this framework to a dataset from a previous study. Our approach allows us to explore how operators’ ability and different automation conditions impact the performance and relative risk dynamics. Our results on performance dynamics show that, on average, operators perform better(1) using automation that is more reliable and (2) using partial automation (more workload) than full automation(less workload). Our analysis of relative risk dynamics indicates that automation with higher reliability has higher relative risk dynamics. This suggests that operators are willing to take more risk for automation with higher reliability. Additionally, when the reliability of automation is lower, operators adapt their behaviour to result in lower risk.
AB - Risk has been a key factor influencing trust in Human-Automation interactions, though there is no unified tool to study its dynamics. We provide a framework for defining and assessing relative risk of automation usage through performance dynamics and apply this framework to a dataset from a previous study. Our approach allows us to explore how operators’ ability and different automation conditions impact the performance and relative risk dynamics. Our results on performance dynamics show that, on average, operators perform better(1) using automation that is more reliable and (2) using partial automation (more workload) than full automation(less workload). Our analysis of relative risk dynamics indicates that automation with higher reliability has higher relative risk dynamics. This suggests that operators are willing to take more risk for automation with higher reliability. Additionally, when the reliability of automation is lower, operators adapt their behaviour to result in lower risk.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85195272390&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85195272390&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1071181322661471
DO - 10.1177/1071181322661471
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:85195272390
SN - 1071-1813
VL - 66
SP - 1230
EP - 1234
JO - Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
JF - Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
IS - 1
T2 - 66th International Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, HFES 2022
Y2 - 10 October 2022 through 14 October 2022
ER -