TY - JOUR
T1 - Parameterizing agreement features in Arabic, Bantu languages, and varieties of English
AU - Van Gelderen, Elly
PY - 1996/1/1
Y1 - 1996/1/1
N2 - Subject-verb (SV) and verb-subject (VS) structures differ where agreement is concerned. The question to be answered is why languages display less verbal agreement in VS structures than in SV structures. Within a government-binding framework, the problem has been accounted for (e.g. by Koopman and Sportiche 1991) by arguing that there is a real Spec-Head agreement relationship in SV structures (with the subject in the specifier position and the verb in the head of a functional projection) but a government relationship in VS structures (with the moved verb governing the subject position). In this paper, I explain the different agreement patterns in Arabic, Kirundi/Kinyarwandi, and Belfast English through a modification of the minimalist framework (cf. Chomsky 1992). I argue that in VS structures, expletives are responsible for the agreement (and the "breakdown" of agreement). Expletives, which may for instance be specified for singular number, are inserted and check some of the phi features. The other features are checked after the NP moves at LF. "Dividing up" the agreement (or phi) features accounts for a number of "breakdowns" in agreement in the other two languages as well.
AB - Subject-verb (SV) and verb-subject (VS) structures differ where agreement is concerned. The question to be answered is why languages display less verbal agreement in VS structures than in SV structures. Within a government-binding framework, the problem has been accounted for (e.g. by Koopman and Sportiche 1991) by arguing that there is a real Spec-Head agreement relationship in SV structures (with the subject in the specifier position and the verb in the head of a functional projection) but a government relationship in VS structures (with the moved verb governing the subject position). In this paper, I explain the different agreement patterns in Arabic, Kirundi/Kinyarwandi, and Belfast English through a modification of the minimalist framework (cf. Chomsky 1992). I argue that in VS structures, expletives are responsible for the agreement (and the "breakdown" of agreement). Expletives, which may for instance be specified for singular number, are inserted and check some of the phi features. The other features are checked after the NP moves at LF. "Dividing up" the agreement (or phi) features accounts for a number of "breakdowns" in agreement in the other two languages as well.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1842502671&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1842502671&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1515/ling.1996.34.4.753
DO - 10.1515/ling.1996.34.4.753
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:1842502671
SN - 0024-3949
VL - 34
SP - 753
EP - 767
JO - Linguistics
JF - Linguistics
IS - 344
ER -