Paradigm Development in Crime-Related Education: The Role of the Significant Others

Jack R. Greene, Timothy S. Bynum, Vincent J. Webb

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Scopus citations


Scientific paradigms provide broad definitions of the parameters of inquiry and the accepted and dominant constructs and theories in a field of study. They also provide the basis for socializing the field's future practitioners. These paradigms suggest ways for viewing, classifying, and interpreting physical and social events. The research reported here assesses paradigm development in crime-related education by examining the role of significant others in defining and maintaining paradigms in criminal justice and criminology. Two dominant perspectives in crime-related education are identified, “Analytical Criminal Justice” and “Institutional Criminal Justice.” In the analysis provided, the opinion leaders within both perspectives, the basis of evaluations, and the adherents of each perspective can be readily identified.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)7-17
Number of pages11
JournalCriminal Justice Review
Issue number2
StatePublished - Sep 1985
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law


Dive into the research topics of 'Paradigm Development in Crime-Related Education: The Role of the Significant Others'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this