TY - JOUR
T1 - Origins of the human predatory pattern
T2 - The transition to large-animal exploitation by early hominins
AU - Thompson, Jessica C.
AU - Carvalho, Susana
AU - Marean, Curtis W.
AU - Alemseged, Zeresenay
N1 - Funding Information:
Istituto di Scienze e Tecnologie della Cognizione, National Research Council of Italy (CNR), via Aldrovandi 16 b, 00197 Rome, Italy (elisabetta.visalberghi@gmail.com). 27 II 18
Funding Information:
The ideas presented here were generated through discussions with Bill Kimbel, Andrew Barr, Denné Reed, Shannon Mc-Pherron, and René Bobe. Bill Kimbel provided valuable comments on an earlier draft. J.C.T. and C.W.M. recognize the support of the John Templeton Foundation (to the Institute of Human Origins). The opinions expressed here are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the John Templeton Foundation. We are very grateful to Luis da Silva for providing the illustrated alternative scenarios. Three anonymous reviewers and the editorial team at Current Anthropology provided much constructive critique and greatly improved the article. This article was conceptualized while the lead author was based at the University of Queensland and written while at Emory University.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 by The Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/2/1
Y1 - 2019/2/1
N2 - The habitual consumption of large-animal resources (e.g., similar sized or larger than the consumer) separates human and nonhuman primate behavior. Flaked stone tool use, another important hominin behavior, is often portrayed as being functionally related to this by the necessity of a sharp edge for cutting animal tissue. However, most research on both issues emphasizes sites that postdate ca. 2.0 million years ago. This paper critically examines the theoretical significance of the earlier origins of these two behaviors, their proposed interrelationship, and the nature of the empirical record. We argue that concepts of meat-eating and tool use are too loosely defined: outside-bone nutrients (e.g., meat) and inside-bone nutrients (e.g., marrow and brains) have different macronutrient characteristics (protein vs. fat), mechanical requirements for access (cutting vs. percussion), search, handling and competitive costs, encounter rates, and net returns. Thus, they would have demanded distinct technological and behavioral solutions. We propose that the regular exploitation of large-animal resources—the “human predatory pattern”—began with an emphasis on percussion-based scavenging of inside-bone nutrients, independent of the emergence of flaked stone tool use. This leads to a series of empirical test implications that differ from previous “meat-eating” origins scenarios.
AB - The habitual consumption of large-animal resources (e.g., similar sized or larger than the consumer) separates human and nonhuman primate behavior. Flaked stone tool use, another important hominin behavior, is often portrayed as being functionally related to this by the necessity of a sharp edge for cutting animal tissue. However, most research on both issues emphasizes sites that postdate ca. 2.0 million years ago. This paper critically examines the theoretical significance of the earlier origins of these two behaviors, their proposed interrelationship, and the nature of the empirical record. We argue that concepts of meat-eating and tool use are too loosely defined: outside-bone nutrients (e.g., meat) and inside-bone nutrients (e.g., marrow and brains) have different macronutrient characteristics (protein vs. fat), mechanical requirements for access (cutting vs. percussion), search, handling and competitive costs, encounter rates, and net returns. Thus, they would have demanded distinct technological and behavioral solutions. We propose that the regular exploitation of large-animal resources—the “human predatory pattern”—began with an emphasis on percussion-based scavenging of inside-bone nutrients, independent of the emergence of flaked stone tool use. This leads to a series of empirical test implications that differ from previous “meat-eating” origins scenarios.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061660402&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061660402&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1086/701477
DO - 10.1086/701477
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85061660402
SN - 0011-3204
VL - 60
SP - 1
EP - 23
JO - Current anthropology
JF - Current anthropology
IS - 1
ER -