TY - JOUR
T1 - Observed Engagement in Community Implemented Evidence-Based Practices for Children and Adolescents
T2 - Implications for Practice Delivery
AU - Wright, Blanche
AU - Brookman-Frazee, Lauren
AU - Kim, Joanna J.
AU - Gellatly, Resham
AU - Kuckertz, Mary
AU - Lau, Anna S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Society of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Objective: This observational study characterizes youth and caregiver behaviors that may pose challenges to engagement within a system-driven implementation of multiple evidence-based practices (EBPs). We examined links between Engagement Challenges and therapist EBP implementation outcomes. Method: Community therapists (N = 102) provided audio recordings of EBP sessions (N = 666) for youth (N = 267; 71.54%, Latinx; 51.69%, female; M age = 9.85, Range: 1–18). Observers rated the extent to which youth and/or caregivers engaged in the following behaviors: Caregiver and/or Youth Expressed Concerns about interventions, and Youth Disruptive Behaviors. Multilevel modeling was used to identify predictors of observable Engagement Challenges, and examine associations between Engagement Challenges, and therapist-reported ability to deliver planned activities, and observer-rated extensiveness of EBP strategy delivery. Results: At least one Engagement Challenge was observed in 43.99% of sessions. Youth Engagement Challenges were not associated with outcomes. Caregiver Expressed Concerns were negatively associated with therapist-reported ability to carry out planned session activities (B = −.21, 95% CI[−.39-(−.02)], p < .05). However, Caregiver Expressed Concerns were positively associated with extensiveness of EBP Content strategy delivery (B =.08, 95% CI[.01-.15], p < .05). Conclusions: Results suggest that Youth Engagement Challenges have little observed impact on EBP delivery. In contrast, although therapists perceive that Caregiver Expressed Concerns derail their planned activities, Caregiver Expressed Concerns are associated with more extensive delivery of content about therapeutic interventions. Community therapists’ implementation of EBPs appear unaffected by common youth in-session behavioral challenges, but future research is needed to clarify whether caregivers’ concerns about interventions prompt, or are prompted by, more intensive therapist EBP content instruction.
AB - Objective: This observational study characterizes youth and caregiver behaviors that may pose challenges to engagement within a system-driven implementation of multiple evidence-based practices (EBPs). We examined links between Engagement Challenges and therapist EBP implementation outcomes. Method: Community therapists (N = 102) provided audio recordings of EBP sessions (N = 666) for youth (N = 267; 71.54%, Latinx; 51.69%, female; M age = 9.85, Range: 1–18). Observers rated the extent to which youth and/or caregivers engaged in the following behaviors: Caregiver and/or Youth Expressed Concerns about interventions, and Youth Disruptive Behaviors. Multilevel modeling was used to identify predictors of observable Engagement Challenges, and examine associations between Engagement Challenges, and therapist-reported ability to deliver planned activities, and observer-rated extensiveness of EBP strategy delivery. Results: At least one Engagement Challenge was observed in 43.99% of sessions. Youth Engagement Challenges were not associated with outcomes. Caregiver Expressed Concerns were negatively associated with therapist-reported ability to carry out planned session activities (B = −.21, 95% CI[−.39-(−.02)], p < .05). However, Caregiver Expressed Concerns were positively associated with extensiveness of EBP Content strategy delivery (B =.08, 95% CI[.01-.15], p < .05). Conclusions: Results suggest that Youth Engagement Challenges have little observed impact on EBP delivery. In contrast, although therapists perceive that Caregiver Expressed Concerns derail their planned activities, Caregiver Expressed Concerns are associated with more extensive delivery of content about therapeutic interventions. Community therapists’ implementation of EBPs appear unaffected by common youth in-session behavioral challenges, but future research is needed to clarify whether caregivers’ concerns about interventions prompt, or are prompted by, more intensive therapist EBP content instruction.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85113793209&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85113793209&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/15374416.2021.1955366
DO - 10.1080/15374416.2021.1955366
M3 - Article
C2 - 34424121
AN - SCOPUS:85113793209
SN - 1537-4416
VL - 52
SP - 475
EP - 489
JO - Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology
JF - Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology
IS - 4
ER -