Nurses' informal argument: Learning to justify the claim and reach agreement

Debra Hagler; Sarah Brem

Nurses' informal argument: Learning to justify the claim and reach agreement

Debra Hagler, Sarah Brem

Social and Family Dynamics, T. Denny Sanford School of (SSFD)

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

Abstract

Nurses convince their peers of the need for ongoing action and monitoring during change-of-shift discourse about patient health issues. Twenty pairs of critical-care nurses participated in a qualitative study of authentic everyday argument at the bedside. The process of providing and evaluating evidence for claims and justifying decisions during nursing shift report included pragmatic and structural aspects of persuasive argument in the context of a high-stress, high-stakes, time-pressured environment.

Original language	English (US)
Title of host publication	ICLS 2006 - International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Proceedings
Pages	932-933
Number of pages	2
State	Published - Dec 1 2006
Event	7th International Conference of the Learning Sciences, ICLS 2006 - Bloomington, IN, United States Duration: Jun 27 2006 → Jul 1 2006

Publication series

Name	ICLS 2006 - International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Proceedings
Volume	2

Other

Other	7th International Conference of the Learning Sciences, ICLS 2006
Country/Territory	United States
City	Bloomington, IN
Period	6/27/06 → 7/1/06

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Computer Science (miscellaneous)
Education

Cite this

Nurses' informal argument: Learning to justify the claim and reach agreement. / Hagler, Debra; Brem, Sarah.
ICLS 2006 - International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Proceedings. 2006. p. 932-933 (ICLS 2006 - International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Proceedings; Vol. 2).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

Hagler, D & Brem, S 2006, Nurses' informal argument: Learning to justify the claim and reach agreement. in ICLS 2006 - International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Proceedings. ICLS 2006 - International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Proceedings, vol. 2, pp. 932-933, 7th International Conference of the Learning Sciences, ICLS 2006, Bloomington, IN, United States, 6/27/06.

@inproceedings{52b155ee863c4a89826aea5c510d0e80,

title = "Nurses' informal argument: Learning to justify the claim and reach agreement",

abstract = "Nurses convince their peers of the need for ongoing action and monitoring during change-of-shift discourse about patient health issues. Twenty pairs of critical-care nurses participated in a qualitative study of authentic everyday argument at the bedside. The process of providing and evaluating evidence for claims and justifying decisions during nursing shift report included pragmatic and structural aspects of persuasive argument in the context of a high-stress, high-stakes, time-pressured environment.",

author = "Debra Hagler and Sarah Brem",

year = "2006",

month = dec,

day = "1",

language = "English (US)",

isbn = "0805861742",

series = "ICLS 2006 - International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Proceedings",

pages = "932--933",

booktitle = "ICLS 2006 - International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Proceedings",

note = "7th International Conference of the Learning Sciences, ICLS 2006 ; Conference date: 27-06-2006 Through 01-07-2006",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Nurses' informal argument

T2 - 7th International Conference of the Learning Sciences, ICLS 2006

AU - Hagler, Debra

AU - Brem, Sarah

PY - 2006/12/1

Y1 - 2006/12/1

N2 - Nurses convince their peers of the need for ongoing action and monitoring during change-of-shift discourse about patient health issues. Twenty pairs of critical-care nurses participated in a qualitative study of authentic everyday argument at the bedside. The process of providing and evaluating evidence for claims and justifying decisions during nursing shift report included pragmatic and structural aspects of persuasive argument in the context of a high-stress, high-stakes, time-pressured environment.

AB - Nurses convince their peers of the need for ongoing action and monitoring during change-of-shift discourse about patient health issues. Twenty pairs of critical-care nurses participated in a qualitative study of authentic everyday argument at the bedside. The process of providing and evaluating evidence for claims and justifying decisions during nursing shift report included pragmatic and structural aspects of persuasive argument in the context of a high-stress, high-stakes, time-pressured environment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884296793&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84884296793&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84884296793

SN - 0805861742

SN - 9780805861747

T3 - ICLS 2006 - International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Proceedings

SP - 932

EP - 933

BT - ICLS 2006 - International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Proceedings

Y2 - 27 June 2006 through 1 July 2006

ER -

Nurses' informal argument: Learning to justify the claim and reach agreement

Abstract

Publication series

Other

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this