Normative labels in two lexicographic traditions: A slovene-english case study

Marjeta Vrbinc, Danko Šipka, Alenka Vrbinc

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article presents and discusses the findings of a study conducted with the users of Slovene and American monolingual dictionaries. The aim was to investigate how native speakers of Slovene and American English interpret select normative labels in monolingual dictionaries. The data were obtained by questionnaires developed to elicit monolingual dictionary users' attitudes toward normative labels and the effects the labels have on dictionary users. The results show that a higher level of prescriptivism in the Slovene linguistic culture is reflected in the Slovene respondents' perception of the labels (for example, a stronger effect of the normative labels, a higher approval for the claim about usefulness of the labels, a considerably lower general level of acceptance for the standard language) when compared with the American respondents' perception, since the American linguistic culture tends to be more descriptive. However, users often seek answers to their linguistic questions in dictionaries, which means that they expect at least a certain degree of normativity. Therefore, a balance between descriptive and prescriptive approaches should be found, since both of them affect the users.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)561-582
Number of pages22
JournalLexikos
Volume30
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2020

Keywords

  • (UN)Labeled entries
  • Descriptivism
  • General monolingual dictionary
  • Normative labels
  • Normativity
  • Prescriptivism
  • Primary exclusion labels
  • Secondary exclusion labels
  • Use of labels
  • Usefulness of labels

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Normative labels in two lexicographic traditions: A slovene-english case study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this